Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

"For children (0-17 years), cumulative COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than cumulative influenza hospitalization rates at comparable time points* during recent influenza seasons."-CDC

Yeah, it's well known that COVID generally doesn't hit the young all that hard when we know the flu can be pretty dangerous for young children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

"For children (0-17 years), cumulative COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than cumulative influenza hospitalization rates at comparable time points* during recent influenza seasons."-CDC

I understand the statement, but what is your overall premise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I understand the statement, but what is your overall premise?

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

That kids are fuging super spreaders of basically any illness. They are little disease bags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

If you have kids teaching kids, kids running the schools, kids driving the school buses and kids raising themselves when they get home...there's no reason to shut down the schools.

The issue is not the kids, its all of the people they come in contact with.  And maybe school has changed since I was there, but a majority of my teachers could be considered higher risk.

Edited by Wes21
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted

Science still does not have a firm understanding on how much kids can spread Covid. The data is just not there since schools were shut down so fast back in March.


Since we don’t know, Governors and schools are taking a cautious approach. Low risk does not mean no risk.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

If everyone went potty like they should, we could eliminate diapers. Little kids have a different set of ideas than ( most) adults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That kids are fuging super spreaders of basically any illness. They are little disease bags.

True, but do we close down schools for the flu?  Does the flu not spread from kids to adults?  Asymptomatic folks are less likely to be a vector than symptomatic persons.  Again, college is a whole different ball of wax, but K-12 should be straight forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Tbe said:

Science still does not have a firm understanding on how much kids can spread Covid. The data is just not there since schools were shut down so fast back in March.


Since we don’t know, Governors and schools are taking a cautious approach. Low risk does not mean no risk.

 

Ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      NFL other games

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      Tennessee just fired their coach.  I guess thats good to do before he completely destroys ward.  I dont know though
    • PanthersGTI
      I’m gonna say it… I’m proud of Bryce.

      By PanthersGTI · Posted

      Y'all are funny. and dumb. The argument I am seeing now if he can only be considered good if he WRs are trash or the play call has to make it hard for him? WTF haha
    • tukafan21
      Bryce stats past the sticks

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
×
×
  • Create New...