Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Where are the massive outbreaks? Those viruses aren't very biologically successful.

They are both Coronavirus’ that preceded this one. We never developed a vaccine for either of the two former viruses. The point is can a vaccine be developed at all, if they are struggling to get a vaccination for the previous two iterations and had twenty years to make one.

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, philit99 said:

They are both Coronavirus’ that preceded this one. We never developed a vaccine for either of the two former viruses. The point is can a vaccine be developed at all, if they are struggling to get a vaccination for the previous two iterations and had twenty years to make one.

Those viruses weren't very biologically successful and vaccine development is very costly, both in monetary terms and resources. The outbreaks didn't last long enough for the early vaccine efforts to come to fruition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, philit99 said:

They are both Coronavirus’ that preceded this one. We never developed a vaccine for either of the two former viruses. The point is can a vaccine be developed at all, if they are struggling to get a vaccination for the previous two iterations and had twenty years to make one.

Developers won’t make money from those vaccines. If they were highly contagious and deadly a vaccine would be developed.

Edited by Car123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Those viruses weren't very biologically successful and vaccine development is very costly, both in monetary terms and resources. The outbreaks didn't last long enough for the early vaccine efforts to come to fruition. 

And from what little I have read and know about it, we are light years ahead of where we were during those outbreaks medical technology wise as far as drug/vacs development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stirs said:

After suspicion of China cheating on numbers, they suddenly find 1300 new deaths in one day.

there's speculation that china's death toll was actually in the several 10s of millions. someone got to this number by the sudden cancellation of cell phones. 

long story short thats either the explanation or a bunch of click farms suddenly went offline. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Following the SARS outbreak in 2003, researchers produced a vaccine that made it to phase one human trials, which test the safety of a new drug. But the effort never progressed further, mainly due to shifting research priorities as the outbreak came to an end, says Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime and current director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

 https://time.com/5768956/wuhan-coronavirus-vaccine-treatment/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

there's speculation that china's death toll was actually in the several 10s of millions. someone got to this number by the sudden cancellation of cell phones. 

long story short thats either the explanation or a bunch of click farms suddenly went offline. 

Not even China can cover up tens of millions of deaths. We'll never get a real number out of them and I suspect the real number is significantly higher than the reported number, likely by several magnitudes but several 10s of millions? Nah, not a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not even China can cover up tens of millions of deaths. We'll never get a real number out of them and I suspect the real number is significantly higher than the reported number, likely by several magnitudes but several 10s of millions? Nah, not a chance.

yeah there's also a poo load of weird things going on like someone just filming truck after truck leaving this factory in urns and extrapolated it to a similar number but obviously you're going down a rabbit hole there with a bunch of people you generally don't want to associate with

also morbidly if you told me 30 million died in india and they just didn't report it, after having lived there, i'd absolutely believe it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

yeah there's also a poo load of weird things going on like someone just filming truck after truck leaving this factory in urns and extrapolated it to a similar number but obviously you're going down a rabbit hole there with a bunch of people you generally don't want to associate with

also morbidly if you told me 30 million died in india and they just didn't report it, after having lived there, i'd absolutely believe it 

Just do the math. Even if everyone in China contracted the virus and we figure an overall 2% mortality rate of the infected (not confirmed infected, but overall infected), that's 27M dead. The virus just isn't lethal enough to kill tens of millions in China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just do the math. Even if everyone in China contracted the virus and we figure an overall 2% mortality rate of the infected (not confirmed infected, but overall infected), that's 27M dead. The virus just isn't lethal enough to kill tens of millions in China.

China healthcare and sanitation are trash.  Factor in decades of polluted air and severe respiratory disease among Chinese, It likely be higher than 2%.

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

China healthcare and sanitation are trash.  Factor in decades of polluted air and severe respiratory disease among Chinese, It likely be higher than 2%.

Even if it is substantially higher than 2% in China, that 27M figure was assuming literally ever last person in China was infected which certainly is nowhere near the case. Let's say 20% of the Hubei Province became infected and they experienced a 10% mortality rate. That adds up to roughly 1.2M. Then lets say 5% of the rest of China became infected (which I think is highly unlikely given China's lockdown of the Hubei Province) and they experienced a 5% mortality rate as their medical facilities weren't overrun. That adds up to another 3.2M. That's a total of 4.4M. 

I have no problem assuming China's actual numbers are several, perhaps even many magnitudes greater than they're reporting. I think several magnitudes higher is highly likely. But tens of millions? Nope, not even coming close to buying that. 100k dead in the Hubei Province though? Honestly, that wouldn't terribly shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering how contagious this is and the population density there, you have to believe a ton of people died or were critical before authorities even grasped what was going on.

Either that or they knew what the virus was and that it was out very early. If so, I wonder how they figured it out so fast? *sarcasm*

Edited by Tbe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well it's not exactly new information that you don't have to draft a QB in the top 5 to compete for a championship. But the poorly run organizations end up with the first three picks. Most of the QB's drafted there never stand a chance. And then you have teams like the Panthers led by the Tepper's that would rather make a big splash to serve their own egos and get talked about in the media for several weeks by trading all the way up than actually being intelligent and strategic and staying put. Worst outcome in that is if you miss you can try again without mortaging your future. But there is another layer in all this. The league is changing again. Even a guy like Darnold with all his physical tools every box checked in that area did very little in the Super Bowl. Seattle had a stout roster all around. Same thing with the Eagles when they blew out the Chiefs. Yet here we are stuck with the tiniest QB in the league.
    • Which highly drafted QBs have actually experienced having a short leash? Most of these guys get multiple years of starting to show what they have.
    • I actually think Cam Newton is directly to blame for the crazy short leash these QBs are given now.  He was so good so early in his career that he reset the standard for young QB play.  Before he showed up it wasn't uncommon for the learning curve to be a full two or three seasons.  The high draft pick guys that had short careers prior to him typically had injuries or off field issues.
×
×
  • Create New...