Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

R0CKnR0LLA Rising Star

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

Since some seem to miss this point completely, the mask isn't there solely to prevent you from catching the virus. It's also there to prevent you from spreading it to other people if you have it.

It's not enough to "cover your mouth when you need to" when you cough or whatever. You spread droplets from your mouth just from talking and breathing.

Wear a mask people, again, it's not that hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Veteran

electro's horse

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

Which report was that?   I'd be encouraged to see the 75% number. 

In general I'd recommend against the name calling. Makes it seem like you don't have any actual facts to support your argument. 

https://fightcovid19.hku.hk/hku-hamster-research-shows-masks-effective-in-preventing-covid-19-transmission/

the institute is legit

this hasn't been peer reviewed yet, however. Though it kinda lines up with common fuging sense so

 

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Xtreme Community Regular

Xtreme

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

Which report was that?   I'd be encouraged to see the 75% number. 

In general I'd recommend against the name calling. Makes it seem like you don't have any actual facts to support your argument. 

Ask electro, he's the one that made that claim about the 75% number, not me. 

Secondly, you're going to call me out for calling him a dork, but going to ignore him when he said "Whether or not you can think two moves ahead and understand this" which implies I'm slow. He gets a pass, right? 

And what facts was I trying to pass off in my argument? Everything I said was based on my own personal opinion. I wasn't trying to pass anything off as "facts." 

Edited by Xtreme
Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Veteran

electro's horse

Posted
Posted

this is a really good graph to pay attention to

image.thumb.png.4c2d5ba8141cc486a7082878e2c4f449.png

basically if you remove the places that actually had aggressive lockdown procedures, you don't have a large mass pulling the overall numbers down. 

rest of america is uh, not doing great. and again, this is with georgia, tx, and fl cooking the books. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Veteran

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

this is a really good graph to pay attention to

image.thumb.png.4c2d5ba8141cc486a7082878e2c4f449.png

basically if you remove the places that actually had aggressive lockdown procedures, you don't have a large mass pulling the overall numbers down. 

rest of america is uh, not doing great. and again, this is with georgia, tx, and fl cooking the books. 

I guarantee NY and NJ are fudging numbers, too.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

life just isn't worth living unless I can sit in the stands drinking luke warm $13 budweisers while cheering on the panthers to an inevitable 3-13 season

what’s happening in Wisconsin has shown the hypocrisy of reopening for the sake of the economy. it’s all about going to a bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WelshPanther
      Official NHL Playoffs Thread 2024

      By WelshPanther · Posted

      Going to be Sunday afternoon again which sucks.
    • raleigh-panther
      The Panthers Huddle Offseason Special

      By raleigh-panther · Posted

      The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • mountainpantherfan2
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By mountainpantherfan2 · Posted

      There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...