Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hospitalization in SC - 1423 today. Everyday day continues a new high mark in hospitalizations.  Deaths will follow suit (22 today)

1423 is COVID hospitalizations in SC.  

Total beds occupied (for any illness) in SC is still hovering at 75%

*NC follows setting another hospitalization  record  at 1034. 

Going to be REALLY hard for schools to open back up here as both states continue climbing to their peaks of the pandemic.  School returning  will have its own giant bump it would bring. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember the vast majority of the patients diagnosed with covid19 don't get a hospital bed right away

it's taking around 5-7 days for most people that end up needing a bed getting one for covid19. they're getting sent home and being told to hang tough, then......

basically what im saying is SC is turbo fuged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

remember the vast majority of the patients diagnosed with covid19 don't get a hospital bed right away

it's taking around 5-7 days for most people that end up needing a bed getting one for covid19. they're getting sent home and being told to hang tough, then......

basically what im saying is SC is turbo fuged

Yeah, I don’t really care about newly reported cases.  Lot of that is asymptotic healthy people that are tested because they can or had an exposure, barely sick people, people retesting, etc.  

hospitalizations is the number and it ain’t good. SC is worse than NC but don’t sleep on NC.  They are trending the same. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really confused why all these sites have different numbers. 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc lists 884 deaths.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ lists 905

Should at least something as straightforward as deaths be the same? 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc says over 9k newly infected 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ shows only 1500 new cases.

I'm very confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I'm really confused why all these sites have different numbers. 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc lists 884 deaths.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ lists 905

Should at least something as straightforward as deaths be the same? 

https://covid19-projections.com/us-sc says over 9k newly infected 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/south-carolina/ shows only 1500 new cases.

I'm very confused.

Easy question.  

These are not official sites. They gather statistic from offical sources, collected by code or people manually adding it.

 

If you want accurate numbers always go to the offical sites. 

These sites should only be used to get a overview, a general picture of the situation in countries and states.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

Yeah, I don’t really care about newly reported cases.  Lot of that is asymptotic healthy people that are tested because they can or had an exposure, barely sick people, people retesting, etc.  

hospitalizations is the number and it ain’t good. SC is worse than NC but don’t sleep on NC.  They are trending the same. 

 

A little over 1000 hospitalizations in a population of 10.5 million when this thing has been here since March does not say "hotspot" to me. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

A little over 1000 hospitalizations in a population of 10.5 million when this thing has been here since March does not say "hotspot" to me. 

1. a vast minority of patients with covid require hospitalization. far more will, in the coming days, but for now we're still actually in the early days of this spike

2. doctors are encouraging patients NOT to be admitted, knowing they need the ICU space. South Carolina right now is at about 76% occupancy, and that is about to spike. 

3. Infections race ahead of positive cases race ahead of hospitalizations. The data coming out of south carolina right now is....horrific. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

2. doctors are encouraging patients NOT to be admitted, knowing they need the ICU space. South Carolina right now is at about 76% occupancy, and that is about to spike.

Have there been an increase in ICU units? Can they increase it?

In Sweden we had about 526 ICU before the pandemic. During the pandemic it was increased to 1000-1100. Lowest number of free capacity was around 18% (from my memory). ICU in Sweden = always ventilators + personnel to man the unit. Otherwise the patient falls under "hospitalization".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

A little over 1000 hospitalizations in a population of 10.5 million when this thing has been here since March does not say "hotspot" to me. 

You're right. NC isn't a hotspot right now. And our goal is not to become one. The cases steadily rising though requires us to keep our guard up. Don't forget that we've only been in phase 2 for a month and a half and it can take a couple weeks from exposure to hospitalization. We certainly could be worse, but we also shouldn't be high fiving and patting ourselves on the back for setting records for number of hospitalizations without a clear end in sight.

Recently saw a video of Ron de Santis from a few weeks ago boasting defiantly how Florida had been open for weeks and were not seeing many cases. How everyone said their hospitals would get overwhelmed but they were wrong. Looks incredibly foolish now. The problem is if we ignore the trends and loosen all restrictions, the virus can and likely will spread exponentially and we'll join the ranks of Florida, Texas, and Arizona. I don't think we will because to this point, Roy Cooper has been following medical advice and holding off on opening the major niduses for spread like bars. But he's getting heavily opposed from the NC legislature and at some point the pressure may become too much. Guess we'll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

You're right. NC isn't a hotspot right now. And our goal is not to become one. The cases steadily rising though requires us to keep our guard up. Don't forget that we've only been in phase 2 for a month and a half and it can take a couple weeks from exposure to hospitalization. We certainly could be worse, but we also shouldn't be high fiving and patting ourselves on the back for setting records for number of hospitalizations without a clear end in sight.

Recently saw a video of Ron de Santis from a few weeks ago boasting defiantly how Florida had been open for weeks and were not seeing many cases. How everyone said their hospitals would get overwhelmed but they were wrong. Looks incredibly foolish now. The problem is if we ignore the trends and loosen all restrictions, the virus can and likely will spread exponentially and we'll join the ranks of Florida, Texas, and Arizona. I don't think we will because to this point, Roy Cooper has been following medical advice and holding off on opening the major niduses for spread like bars. But he's getting heavily opposed from the NC legislature and at some point the pressure may become too much. Guess we'll see. 

DeSantis was being attacked saying his state was going to be New York.  It's not New York, and they have a long ways to go to get there.  If Florida becomes New York, he was wrong.  If it doesn't, while we have our opinions, he was not really wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...