Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Replacements: A glance at needs by position


MHS831

Recommended Posts

I am proposing that we call this team "The Replacements."  Never been thought of or done before.  (C) I will bold all the returning players at each position.  Sometimes, I have to do this kind of thing to see the big picture, so this is nothing more than sharing that process so it is not a complete waste of time:

OFFENSE

  • Quarterback:  Bridgewater, Walker, Grier (Gone: Newton, Allen)
  • Running Back: McCaffrey, Bonnefon, Scarlett, Davis (Davis is a decent back but $3m unguaranteed salary?)
  • Fullback: Armah (To be honest, why is he taking up a roster spot?)
  • Tight End:  Thomas, DeValve, Manhertz (Gone: Olsen)
  • Right Tackle:  Moton
  • Right Guard: Miller (Gone:  Turner)
  • Center:  Paradis, Larsen
  • Left Guard: Daley.  Reed (Had to guess Daley here--If someone goes down, Daley gets moved out and Larsen in-as it stands right now:  Gone: Williams, Van Roten.  Did not bold because he is new to the position)
  • Left Tackle: Okung, Little  (expect an OL or two to be added to this to screw up these projections)'
  • Wide Receiver:  Moore, Samuel, Zylstra, Cooper, Kirkwood, Roberts (Gone:  Wright, Hogan--it is possible that we have only 2 returning WRs from 2019)

So Basically, we have 9 new faces on the offense, 5 new faces projected to start; 6 new faces (if you include Daley at LG, as I am projecting now)  starting at the 11 starting positions--so far.

DEFENSE  (Thinking 4-3)

  • Free Safety:  Boston, Luke (Not sure what to call Luke-CB or S-or if he is even on the expected roster)
  • Strong Safety: Burris (Gone: Reid, Jones)
  • Cornerback:  Jackson, Elder (Gone: Bradberry, Cockrell, Elliot)
  • Outside Linebacker: Thompson, Carter, Smith
  • Inside LB:  Whitehead, Kunaszyk (Gone: Keuchley)
  • Defensive End:  Burns, Weatherly, Obada, Miller, Haynes, Smith (Gone: Irvin)
  • Defensive Tackle:  Short   (Gone: Butler, Poe, McCoy)

Analysis: Bunch of pieces that do not fit.  6 new starters.  Haynes and Miller should probably be depth on a 3-4 defense. DT--are we sure that we can win with only 1?  We should have brought in a free agent.  Still might.   I can see Carter and Thompson at OLB, but MLB is weak.  DE--should be decent.  I doubt we do much more.  However, we need 2 CBs, at least 2 DTs.  I have a feeling they are waiting until the end of free agency and will bring back Cockrell or Elliot when they are cheap.  Hopefully, they will sign a DT as well.

OVERALL

Could this draft be almost pure defense? Multiple needs at CB and DT.  The offensive line has changed, but has it improved? Tackle should be better, but G and C?    I think we need to add a C/G and WR--but with 8 picks, we could find a C/G depth player to develop later and maybe a WR earlier.  However, if we do not trade back--and that has to be the plan with so many needs--we still won't have enough picks in the draft to fill all the need areas.

I think we will look to trade back for picks--I do not see one player that will make the difference enough to stay at #7--unless Simmons or Okudah drop to us.  Simmons is the most likely.  However, moving back for a team wanting a Simmons might be the best move. We simply need to fill too many holes.  Ideally, you want to enter the draft with one or two holes to fill and other positions that need depth or possible upgrading.  As it stands right now, we have no choice but to draft for need at the following positions:

Must have:

  • CB
  • DT (1 tech)
  • DT (3 tech)

Should have:

  • MLB (Whitehead is not the answer, but he and Kunaszyk will have to do for this year-Smith can also play MLB)
  • OLB  (Carter and Smith can hold down one side)
  • G/C  (Draft a C that can play G)
  • WR (Not sure what we have, to be honest)
  • DT (1 tech)

Just the way I see it today.  We could see a CB or WR on day 1, as well as a DT or LB.  I think if Okudah is not there, we move back. Simmons is a great player, and I have been predicting that he would be the pick, but we might have to draft pure need this year.  I think our first three picks will be DT, CB, and WR--in some variation of that order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

That is such an atrocious looking roster. Holy poo. 

Ha.  I had the same thought---did I miss something?  We have way too much work to do to get a team together that will be competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Ha.  I had the same thought---did I miss something?  We have way too much work to do to get a team together that will be competitive.

I have to assume we are going to be much more active in free agency. If we attempt to fill the rest of those holes with draft picks and UDFA's, it is going to be a complete mess. I'd be kind of shocked to see some of our upper end talent really want to be here once their rookie contracts are up(CMC,  Moore, Moton). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with trade down, though it’s always dependent on trade partners. I’d be ok with multiple trade downs tbh. By doing so we could add multiple top five candidates at CB, OT, C/G, DT.

for example:

OT- Josh Jones or Ezra Cleveland 

DT- Blacklock or Gallimore

CB Dantzler, Jaylon Johnson, or Gladney

C/G . Cushenberry, Biadasz, or Ruiz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we act like we don't care about 2020 and we're all willing to support the team and let things develop, then don't worry. Let's get some picks, sign a few guys and see what the coaches do with them. They probably want to see what they got just as bad as the rest of us. We probably don't really know and can't see the future plans (as to players and scheme) just yet. 

I would bet Cam, RB Davis and a few others are still there for trades after the draft. Also, the longer this ban on activities stays in place, the harder it's gonna be for a team to trust a rookie to be their QB with no practice, if Cam passes a physical, he becomes more valuable to a team that maybe gives him a small extension (like adding a 2nd year). 

Things are so fluid, how can we even think to see or know how its gonna play out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are looking for players who are trying to prove themselves with no names. Rhule is trying to make something out of nothing. Look at what he did in college. Never had any stand out recruits. Granted he turned the programs around but this is the NFL. Not college. Rhule is acting as if he is Belichick already. Honestly with the inexperience of this roster I dont see us winning more than 3 games. But what I do see is us next year having alot of cap space and going after everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, section543 said:

Agree with trade down, though it’s always dependent on trade partners. I’d be ok with multiple trade downs tbh. By doing so we could add multiple top five candidates at CB, OT, C/G, DT.

for example:

OT- Josh Jones or Ezra Cleveland 

DT- Blacklock or Gallimore

CB Dantzler, Jaylon Johnson, or Gladney

C/G . Cushenberry, Biadasz, or Ruiz

Hard no on the trading down. Hurney is running this draft and you are immediately cutting one of his best qualities, grabbing high level talent with "can't miss" draft position. 

For a normal situation, I'd be all about it. But this guy is probably going to whiff on almost every round after the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, section543 said:

Agree with trade down, though it’s always dependent on trade partners. I’d be ok with multiple trade downs tbh. By doing so we could add multiple top five candidates at CB, OT, C/G, DT.

for example:

OT- Josh Jones or Ezra Cleveland 

DT- Blacklock or Gallimore

CB Dantzler, Jaylon Johnson, or Gladney

C/G . Cushenberry, Biadasz, or Ruiz

We seem to have been eying the same people in the draft.  You are looking for a late first trade with these names, getting an extra second or two in the process.  By trading back we can get 2-3 of these players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...