Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do we really have?


Cam's New Arm

Recommended Posts

Let's pretend we're a few years from now and we somehow managed to pay our young core guys and all of the offense is still intact. Let's assume Teddy has shown out and we pay him a modest cap figure, putting us against the cap.

What we have here is a stacked offense, meant to carry the defense. If we were against the cap and had this team and Teddy at qb on a real deal, we'd be in the same spot and realistically excited about our chances. The Patriots had Tom Brady, we have CMac.

This team, when it finally hits the field,  might be good enough to rumble with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say realistically our offensive success relies on Teddy B being able to deliver the ball to the WRs and the offensive line being able to protect him enough to do that. We know Anderson can take the top off a defense and we all know what CMC and Moore can do when given space underneath. I think our biggest hangup will be like last year the red zone. If Thomas flourishes then we will have a good bit of success but if not we will be still undersized in the red zone and will have to scheme people open. Finding a Michael Thomas type WR would also help matters a bunch. We don't really have a big body to high point balls and take on LBs over the middle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Snake said:

I would say realistically our offensive success relies on Teddy B being able to deliver the ball to the WRs and the offensive line being able to protect him enough to do that. We know Anderson can take the top off a defense and we all know what CMC and Moore can do when given space underneath. I think our biggest hangup will be like last year the red zone. If Thomas flourishes then we will have a good bit of success but if not we will be still undersized in the red zone and will have to scheme people open. Finding a Michael Thomas type WR would also help matters a bunch. We don't really have a big body to high point balls and take on LBs over the middle. 

We must address the OLine in the draft, and I would really look at Thad Moss later in the draft. Moss could be a late round pick that becomes a red zone target

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what I fear is that we've built a decent enough offense that Joe Brady will leave after two years for a HC position.

I was hoping that our next QB would be a rookie developed by Brady, but we might not get that chance if Teddy performs well enough.

I feel like this Teddy B / DJ / CMC / / Robby Anderson /Joe Brady window will really only last 2 years, and then it's back to the drawing board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GOAT said:

what I fear is that we've built a decent enough offense that Joe Brady will leave after two years for a HC position.

I was hoping that our next QB would be a rookie developed by Brady, but we might not get that chance if Teddy performs well enough.

I feel like this Teddy B / DJ / CMC / / Robby Anderson /Joe Brady window will really only last 2 years, and then it's back to the drawing board.

Honestly, this is what I'm anticipating happening. Our offense will be good but not great, but our defense will be trash and our good offense will pad stats in blowouts with teams playing prevent D and Brady will jump ship to take a HC job after a couple of seasons. Basically what we saw happen with Chud when we initially hired Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Snake said:

I would say realistically our offensive success relies on Teddy B being able to deliver the ball to the WRs and the offensive line being able to protect him enough to do that. We know Anderson can take the top off a defense and we all know what CMC and Moore can do when given space underneath. I think our biggest hangup will be like last year the red zone. If Thomas flourishes then we will have a good bit of success but if not we will be still undersized in the red zone and will have to scheme people open. Finding a Michael Thomas type WR would also help matters a bunch. We don't really have a big body to high point balls and take on LBs over the middle. 

The coaches were our biggest issue in the red zone.  Some of the worst red zone playcalling I’ve ever seenSome of the worst red zone playcalling I’ve ever seen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, GOAT said:

what I fear is that we've built a decent enough offense that Joe Brady will leave after two years for a HC position.

I was hoping that our next QB would be a rookie developed by Brady, but we might not get that chance if Teddy performs well enough.

I feel like this Teddy B / DJ / CMC / / Robby Anderson /Joe Brady window will really only last 2 years, and then it's back to the drawing board.

This isn't JB's first tangle with the NFL, but it is as OC. I think his learning curve will realistically take more than a couple of years. I aldo think that it will be curious to see that if/when he does get an offer, whether Tepper will make it worthwhile for him to stay. Moreover, OC's leave all the time, but good teams move on, and good owners and HC's know how to replace them. Just saying.

On an off note, I think some of you have forgotten how fast Curt really is. He can take the top off defenses too. Let's not forget!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, GOAT said:

what I fear is that we've built a decent enough offense that Joe Brady will leave after two years for a HC position.

I was hoping that our next QB would be a rookie developed by Brady, but we might not get that chance if Teddy performs well enough.

I feel like this Teddy B / DJ / CMC / / Robby Anderson /Joe Brady window will really only last 2 years, and then it's back to the drawing board.

Great point. Exactly why they need to draft a QB for him to groom BEFORE he goes.

We really suffered and wasted Cams best years after Chud left. Being stuck with Teddy Bridgewater isn't exciting anyone besides rastan66.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • College football has zero ability to work together, they are too busy trying actively to rip each others throats out and destroy each others programs. They even do it inside their own conferences, especially the biggest conferences. It's why they are ultimately doomed.
    • I don't care that they're sitting out the bowl game. Yeah, I'm gonna make fun of them for it but I honestly don't care. What I care about is all the special status treatment they get from everyone from the CFP to the ACC to the media. fug all of that. Just treat them like every other team in the country and if they don't like it then tell them to go fug off. The rest of college football holds way more power combined than ND, it's not even close but they act like ND holds the cards. If the rest of college football told them to fug off and stopped scheduling them it would cause minimal overall drop off to college football as a whole while ND football would die very quickly. What are they gonna do, play community colleges? All the real players are gonna hit the portal and ND would be fielding a team of Rudy's in short order, viewership would fall off because no one wants to watch Rudy's play community colleges, the TV contracts would disappear and ND football would be dead. That's exactly what needs to happen. The rest of college football needs to band together on this one and tell them stop, no more of this bullshit. No more special treatment. The same standards that apply to everyone else apply to you and if you don't like it then you can just stomp off and take your ball and go home... again. Just forever this time.
    • I couldn't care less if they do. There are entirely too many in the first place.
×
×
  • Create New...