Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Helmet Aesthetics


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

It has been mentioned many times that folks would like to see a uniform revamp of sorts. One of the common themes is removing the silver altogether or at least going with a black helmet but I haven’t seen much thought of a blue helmet. What does the Huddle think about this concept?

 

My opinion is that it certainly pops with the white unis.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should eliminate the silver-- Our helmet looks too much like New England's helmet.  Then you have the lions, Raiders, etc. 

A black helmet would make us look like the Jags. 

I think our helmet logo would look good on a white helmet.  I think the silver looks stupid with our all-white uniforms that have no silver on them anywhere.

I dunno. I would love to lose the silver out of the uniforms.  We have too many colors.  3 should be tops if you include white.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be okay with it. It looks a little like an arena league helmet, but I'm sure it would grow on me.

I'm also over the silver helmet. It's too retro - I see that spangly ass helmet and just think grainy Dallas Cowboys footage from the 60s-  and doesn't go at all with our color scheme.

Black, agreed would look terrible with out white unis, and a black logo on a black helmet? Don't like white. Looks too much like Indy.

This at least is a color that would be uniquely our own. And in a team that badly need a new identity, or rather has been thrust into finding one, I think making the change would be representative of our organization; new look, eliminating the mistakes of the past, and innovating rather than trying to copy other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

11 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think our helmet logo would look good on a white helmet.  I think the silver looks stupid with our all-white uniforms that have no silver on them anywhere.

I dunno. I would love to lose the silver out of the uniforms.  We have too many colors.  3 should be tops if you include white.

 

I’m not sure white would work either but it would be the only look I’d be willing to give a shot but the silver helmet should stay. Black or blue helmet would look freaking STUPID. 

As far as jerseys go, if they’re ever going to change them I hope it’s very subtle. Maybe remove the stripes over the shoulders and just go with a very clean look or add a couple stripes around the sleeves with the logo over top. 

Clean and classic is what works long term. This blue/black helmet and new stupid nike jersey designs are having team recycle through jerseys every couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

It has been mentioned many times that folks would like to see a uniform revamp of sorts. One of the common themes is removing the silver altogether or at least going with a black helmet but I haven’t seen much thought of a blue helmet. What does the Huddle think about this concept?

 

My opinion is that it certainly pops with the white unis.

 

 

Are you 12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...