Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's Mock Draft and Insight thread 2020


Verge

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Yeah. I stumbled upon Trey Lance trying to watch some Jeremy Chinn tape.  That kid is really fun to watch. 

But seriously watch Mahomes college tape right before his.  Its Eerily similar.

And Lance was just a redshirt Freshman last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ncfan said:

But seriously watch Mahomes college tape right before his.  Its Eerily similar.

And Lance was just a redshirt Freshman last year.

I know Wentz worked out, but there's still a risk in taking a small school QB. I'm still hoping we get a shot at Lawrence somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Wake Forest Jamie Newman does absolutely nothing for me. Maybe the Georgia Jamie Newman will change that but I really don’t get the hype around this kid 

Stats we similar to Daniel Jones, but with rushing yards (less passing) and TDS. It’s tough to measure when you are with Wake Forrest or Duke and constantly playing teams with more talent in their roster. But he has great size and over 60% accuracy. You are right though. This season will show how good he can be. He should have a lot more talent around him this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I know Wentz worked out, but there's still a risk in taking a small school QB. I'm still hoping we get a shot at Lawrence somehow.

Yes. But today.  That risk is no bigger than a big school proespect.  Scouts can see the tools and ability.  It doesn't matter the stats against competition.

 

You could say Burrow is a risk because he only had 1 big year starting.  Couldn't beat out QBs at Ohio State.  Didnt look good his first year at LSU.  And didnt blow up until Joe Brady came in who now is back in the NFL.

Tua even before injury could be justified as a risk.  Guy had a NFL OL and NFL WRs across the board.  He wont have that advantage in the pro's.

 

Point is, its hard enough to find a elite QB now a days.  But the small school vs big school doesnt matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to project a QB to the next level of competition might be the toughest thing in scouting. There's just an infinite number of variables in play. It's why anyone talking about a QB prospect as "can't miss" or whatever other positive draft lingo you want to insert is quite frankly being an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...