Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another report of Samuel being someone who could possibly be traded

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, MMA said:

The more I see of this, the more I believe that Rhule and Brady will take Jeudy or Lamb

As long as it’s a trade back and we pick up an additional 2nd to help the defense with the rest of the draft I’m all for it. We need to go 90 percent defense in this draft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMA Newbie

MMA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Yeah, my brother in law lives in Columbus--an OSU grad and season ticket holder---he told me that Samuel was raw and not even a good fit there.

Juju, Kupp, Godwin, Golladay, Westbrook were all taken after Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMA Newbie

MMA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

As long as it’s a trade back and we pick up an additional 2nd to help the defense with the rest of the draft I’m all for it. We need to go 90 percent defense in this draft 

I’m all up for trading back but it’s harder than you think it is. And, if you have the guy you really like high on your board. Just take him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

Samuel's "so-so" career so far can be attributed pretty much to injured Cam, injured Cam, rookie gunslinger, rookie bench warmer, rookie gunslinger... weak O-line, weaker O-line, devastated O-line.

I wouldn't be ready to sign off on him going elsewhere. There's a lot of potential that has yet to be unveiled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Samuel's "so-so" career so far can be attributed pretty much to injured Cam, injured Cam, rookie gunslinger, rookie bench warmer, rookie gunslinger... weak O-line, weaker O-line, devastated O-line.

I wouldn't be ready to sign off on him going elsewhere. There's a lot of potential that has yet to be unveiled. 

You hope, but he really fell flat after being touted as the camp mvp last season. DJ showed much more promise throughout last season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMA Newbie

MMA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

As long as it’s a trade back and we pick up an additional 2nd to help the defense with the rest of the draft I’m all for it. We need to go 90 percent defense in this draft 

90%? We have 8 picks in 7 rounds. 7 defenders divided by 8 picks = .875%. Man, we can’t even draft 1 offensive player. Jk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMA Newbie

MMA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Madwolf said:

But why take a WR so high in what is one of the deepest WR draft classes in possibly decades? Especially with a gaping hole at DT and CB? We can talk about finding talent at DT in later rounds all we want, but the fact remains that the fall off at DT and CB is a lot sooner than WR in this class.

I’m just talking as a fan. I don’t have a clue what’s going on in Rhule’s $60 mil mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Grand Master

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted

In chess it is called ‘swapping queens’.  If Samuel will be the third or fourth option and you have a glaring hole at CB, you might trade him for a second or high third IF you think this class is exceptionally strong at CB or fill in the blank with another position of need.  We have many holes to fill.  JMO and your mileage may vary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Samuel's "so-so" career so far can be attributed pretty much to injured Cam, injured Cam, rookie gunslinger, rookie bench warmer, rookie gunslinger... weak O-line, weaker O-line, devastated O-line.

I wouldn't be ready to sign off on him going elsewhere. There's a lot of potential that has yet to be unveiled. 

Yeah I want to see what Joe Brady can do with him and a healthy QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I want to see what Joe Brady can do with him and a healthy, accurate beyond 20 yards QB.

FIFY.  Yeah, I definitely agree.  Cam had a deep ball arm, but wasn't all that accurate and Allen's accuracy was lacking beyond dump off range.  Samuel's best attribute is initially beating his man, tuning on the jets and creating separation.  That does no good when the intended pass well off the mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCBlu Experienced

NCBlu

Posted
Posted

Don't know what Samuel did to some of you but he has speed for days and did well with the ball in his hands. He is only 23 and yes is a#2 WR or good slot guy, he is just getting to the year where the light comes on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...