Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wide Receivers


NAS

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Both Rhule and Brady are noted for deploying 4-wide sets almost 90% of the time.  And both emphasize the RPO, reverses, and misdirection.  No player on our roster does that benefit more than Curtis Samuel , IMO. 

I honestly think Rhule and Brady are drooling over the possibility of some of our under-utilized guys alongside the proven CMC.

Also, we currently have 10 WR's on the roster.  Add one elite receiver in the draft and you can cut 4-5 of the others.

I think we will see 3 WR sets with TE and HB and a lot of movement, creating 4 wide with McCaffery or Thomas being the 4th reciever.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GOAT said:

the only WR we would draft early is Lamb or trading back into the first / early second for Mims.

both very unlikely, but I could see it.

I think there's a good chance Mims is available for us in the second

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Brady and Thule wil come out of the draft with a wide receiver.  I don't think it will be a premium pick, it's more likely they will trust there coaching and expertise and go for a sleeper.  Van Jefferson, Tyler Johnson, and Gabriel Davis are guys I like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Both Rhule and Brady are noted for deploying 4-wide sets almost 90% of the time.  And both emphasize the RPO, reverses, and misdirection.  No player on our roster does that benefit more than Curtis Samuel , IMO. 

I honestly think Rhule and Brady are drooling over the possibility of some of our under-utilized guys alongside the proven CMC.

Also, we currently have 10 WR's on the roster.  Add one elite receiver in the draft and you can cut 4-5 of the others.

As our roster stands today, if they run 4 wides 90% of the time then Bridgewater will be broken in 2 by week 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Both Rhule and Brady are noted for deploying 4-wide sets almost 90% of the time.  And both emphasize the RPO, reverses, and misdirection.  No player on our roster does that benefit more than Curtis Samuel , IMO. 

I honestly think Rhule and Brady are drooling over the possibility of some of our under-utilized guys alongside the proven CMC.

Also, we currently have 10 WR's on the roster.  Add one elite receiver in the draft and you can cut 4-5 of the others.

I don't think 4-wide is the way to go, at least not primarily. The Cards had to learn that last year. They ran 10 personnel on 50% of their snaps through the first four games of last year and ended the season with only 18% of their plays out of that grouping. Some of that was due to wide receiver injuries, but their offensive line struggled to protect and they ended up in a lot more 1- or 2-tight end looks.

https://www.sharpfootballstats.com/personnel-grouping-frequency.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

Unpopular opinion but even though Lamb with be drafted first, Mims is better.

I mean I am kindof with you, Lamb is good but his system and qb's were pretty favorable to him.  The only thing I have seen of Mims is the damn insane display at the senior bowl practices and game and of course the combine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Not sure about the CeeDee Lamb rumor but I do like the idea of a WR somewhere in this draft.  The NFC South is going to be SHOOTOUTS for the next couple of years, so load up on offensive weapons and play some freakin' 7-on-7 flag football!  Who needs a nasty OL when you have CMC and Teddy's getting the ball out in 2 seconds to all of these big, FAST, athletic, and versatile play-makers in space:

WR1 DJ Moore
6'2, 200
40-yard dash: 4.42
Vertical: 39.5

WR2 Denzel Mims
6'3, 210
40-yard dash: 4.38
Vertical: 38.5

WR3 Robby Anderson
6'3, 190
40-yard dash: 4.34
Vertical: 36.5

SLOT Curtis Samuel
5'11, 195
40-yard dash: 4.31
Vertical: 37

TB Christian McCaffrey
5'11, 205
40-yard dash: 4.48
Vertical: 37.5

And might as well grab the fastest TE in the draft in Round 4 just for fun...
TE Albert Okwuegbunam (Mizzou)
6'5, 258
40-yard dash: 4.49

On paper, that 4-wide lineup, with Teddy at QB, in Joe Brady's/Matt Rhule's offense is potentially NASTY AF.  Speed, speed, speed...and size, size, size with the hops to go up and get it.

Do the Bucs, Saints, and Falcons have enough bodies in their secondaries to cover all that?  At least we would have an identity and would be fun to watch, while our defense is getting torn apart.  Build an offense that can score 27+ PPG and take your chances on D...

Do we have a QB that can take advantage of that.. Again if we have Mahomes  cool.. Bridgewater isn't known to slang like that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Untouchable said:

Unpopular opinion but even though Lamb with be drafted first, Mims is better.

It's always possible. 1996 was one of if not the best WR draft ever. Keyshawn Johnson went #1 overall, but Marvin Harrison at #19 and Terrell Owens in the 3rd round ended up being much better players. I'd argue that our own Moose in the 2nd round was a better player too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have seen little inclination that they are laying down on him, that I can agree with. I don't think we are going to ever see much in the way of unfiltered opinions in the public realm from his teammates because that's extremely rare and extremely toxic behavior.  It's certainly a positive thing that they support him but, again, that doesn't make a successful NFL starting QB. Playing well on Sunday's does.  That is what has been lacking to date. He is not playing well consistently enough to be considered an NFL starting QB. He has to improve there. Be more consistent. Be more decisive. Make correct decisions more frequently. 
    • That's fine but for every Kurt Warner there are 10 Tony Banks that don't find their spot because....it never really existed.  Jake Browning was on and off practice squad teams for years until he stuck in Cincy. In his limited action over the past two seasons, he has played well enough that the Bengals panic traded for 41 year old Joe Flacco. It's easy to point to outliers like Warner or Purdy or Tom Brady as players who fell through the cracks because....well, they are outliers. The statistics over the long term have never really borne out the argument that every QB is just waiting for their perfect spot and situation. Most of these guys bounce around the league and it just never really clicks anywhere or they become marginal backup QB's. I don't think that exactly an accident. It's tough to be a starting NFL QB and it's why the hunt every offseason is so frantic. There are just so few that do it at a high level. My guess is that a theoretical market for Bryce Young(today) is going to look a lot like that post Chicago Justin Fields market. Not a lot of interest and a late round pick value at the highest. And a lot of that IS going to be his average to below average physical traits. It's extremely tough to be in that range and excel in the NFL. And it's precisely because you DO have to be closer to perfection to make up for the fact that you can't do a lot of the things that the elite to above average starters in this league do. 
    • Im never not impressed by how confidently wrong you are. I've watched probably 200 NFL QBs play live. This talk about Bryce's arm strength is retarded, pure and simple. Bryce can make every throw an NFL QB needs to make in any circumstance. Does he have an arm that makes you go wow all the time? No, but very few QBs truly do. Bryce has plenty of zip on the ball when he wants. That TD to XL was a frozen rope. He throws to the opposite hash and outside all the time with no problem. Bryce's arm is objectively stronger than Cam's post-injury. I've seen both live multiple times and I know. And Cam could still play QB well without his rocket launcher. OPs point remains. QB success relies on a lot of nebulous things. Obviously you dont like Bryce. But his success is not going to be bc he doesn't have the arm strength. Its embarrassing this is a thing. Go to some games and actually educate yourself.  
×
×
  • Create New...