Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rebuild for a LB? 2021 Mock


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

He would complete our defense and has the potential to be on Wagner’s level. Would help replace Luke. Would love Lawrence, Fields, Lance, or Newman, but this isn’t a terrible plan B. Especially if Teddy plays well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Which positions are worth the value?

My statement was in reference to all the people wanting Simmons who is a LB/S hybrid.

For me a top 10 pick is a franchise QB, franchise LT, franchise DE, generational-type DT,  generational-type LB or a true lock down CB.  If none of those are available, then BPA  at WR and IOL.  BPA at TE and RB lastly, but there's zero chance none of the rest will not be available ahead of these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

No LB in the top 10, not worth the value 

If we have a bigger need at a higher positional value, I 100% agree. 

But, like I said about IF we had taken Simmons, at this point we just need talent. Even if Brown was a better and more logical pick, Simmons would have been fine because we are largely devoid of talent as a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

I don't believe in value in certain spots. Give me a difference maker. Also Luuuuuuuke

Some positions matter more than others. We had Luuuuuuuuke for like 9 years and had a top 10 defense just 3 times. Luke is a HoF linebacker but in today's football defensive ends and tackles matter more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
    • Too bad it was all for nothing because his dumbass goalie can't stay on his feet or control the puck when it's right infront of him 
×
×
  • Create New...