Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: Panthers Interested in Acquiring Haason Reddick


Recommended Posts

If we can get Reddick for a reasonable deal and develop him, he can fill TD's WLB role as this young defense grows together.  Whitehead is just a stop gap, but that's still a pretty solid LB corps this year.  If our corners can hold up, this defense won't be quite as bad as many were thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

So ya'll would risk having him cut and being picked up by another team? Instead of offering a 4th? Okay. I get it. lol

If they’re going to cut him in this scenario, why would we need to offer a 4th? A 7th round pick would suffice, unless you think they’d rather cut him for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

So ya'll would risk having him cut and being picked up by another team? Instead of offering a 4th? Okay. I get it. lol

Are we under the false assumption that they will either take a 4th or nothing? Why are we operating on non-existent hypotheticals? I have another idea: offer a conditional 6th as I said in my original post. Jesus, we would be competing against ourselves offering a 4th. That's the kind of moronic move people would rightly be able to pan Hurney for.

Let's review our possible outcomes with Redick. 

A) Redick redeems himself in Rhule/Snow's system, but he's only under a 1 year contract so we either have to give him a huge raise off 1 good year or lose him and be out our 4th round pick for just 1 year of service. At best maybe we get a 5th round comp pick out of it, which will be around 60 picks and 1 year later than the likely early 4th round pick we gave up for him (for reference our 4th was pick 113; the 5th round comp was 179). And the way we've been operating in free agency, there's a better chance than not we wouldn't end up with any comp pick for him because we would just cancel him out by signing someone else.

B) Redick continues to demonstrate he's a bust regardless of the system and we give up a 4th for nothing. Recall that our 4th round pick this year is in line to be our starting cornerback.

C) His play is somewhere in the middle, a borderline starter but more like quality depth. Kind of what you hope for in a 4th round pick. Except instead of the 4 years of near minimum salary we would pay our 4th round pick in 2021, we pay $2.3 million for 1 year of Redick.

Now tell me again, is that worth it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chief Keek said:

I'd wait until he gets cut first. I wouldn't offer any more than a 7th rounder and bo-berry biscuit.

Maybe we can orchestrate a 3-team deal where your Panthers would get Reddick, Arizona would get your 7th and my thanks, and I get the BoBerry biscuit? :Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stbugs said:

His 2020 salary wouldn’t be on their cap anymore. They’d save his 2020 salary $2.3M). There’s no way a team would have that on their cap if the player is traded. The only thing still on the cap is his signing bonus prorated through this year. 

I don't think you are right about that. I am pretty sure that is one of the unique things about those rookie contracts. Perhaps I read an incorrect source but I am pretty sure that is the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule: Marty give me a list of every single player who has ever played for me or any of my coaching staff.

Marty: Why?

Rhule: Because I'm scared and I don't know what I'm doing so we're going after guys I know no matter their talent.

Marty: I'm going to get fired again aren't I?

Rhule: Yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

There is nothing to this rumor. It started when Bill Barnwell wrote an article on ESPN in which he gave 1 player from each team that was in danger of being cut. Barnwell merely suggested Reddick would be cut now that the Cardinals drafted Isaiah Simmons to replace him. Barnwell believed Matt Rhule might be interested in a trade bc he used to coach him. 

 

FD9133D0-FEF5-474B-8653-1AA867125B94.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think you are right about that. I am pretty sure that is one of the unique things about those rookie contracts. Perhaps I read an incorrect source but I am pretty sure that is the case.

It makes no sense to trade someone if you have to pay their salary while on another team. According to Sportrac, Miami’s dead cap for Minkah was only the rest of his signing bonus they had prorated for 2019-2021. It didn’t include any of the salary Pittsburgh is paying. It was a deal for Pittsburgh aside from the pick because for 3 years they pay $6M and Miami had to pay $10.4M for 1 year because of the signing bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...