Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq Thompson


CanadianCat

Recommended Posts

I am very excited about what Shaq's upcoming season. This dude is a freak athletically and I cannot wait to see his expanded role within the team. 

Shaq is still young and now no longer playing under anyone's shadow. Its his season to really step up and I have confidence he will. 

 

Quote

Thompson discussed life without both Davis and Kuechly on NFL Network’s “NFL Total Access” on Wednesday.

“I'm still hurting to this day about that one,” Thompson said. “I lost a great friend, a brother, just a great teammate overall. Luke taught me a lot in my five years, just playing alongside of him and just playing and just learning from him. I'm gonna go out there and try my best. Luckily, we still have him in the organization, in the office. So, he can probably come down and show us things and stuff like that.

“So, he'll still be around to help out with any questions, any football things on and off the field. So, we're glad to have him. But I gotta step up as the last linebacker [of that] trio that we had with Thomas Davis and Luke. So, I gotta step up and fill that role and be that leader.”

 

498319270.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miss them as well. Especially going to miss the Luke chants and flexing around my living room like a dumbass on certain big plays he’d make..

Agree with everything Shaq said and believe he will step up. Cant do it alone though so let’s hope the D comes together sooner than later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Shaq is disrespected constantly in this board.  He would start on almost every team in the NFL.  Maybe people will respect his game more once they see Carter starting on the other side.  

yeah, no.  He is just average.  Its not disrespect its just the truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

Based on?  Your opinion?  Stats don’t back up your assumption.  

Stats?  My eyes dont lie.  But cool man if you think he is going to be some all pro or what not.  Nothing really stands out about him.  He was a project when he was drafted and has never developed into what they thought.  His contract is pretty nuts as well

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team has had Thomas Davis, Sam Mills, Dan Morgan, Luke Kuechly, and Jon Beason.  I think the dropoff between these names and Shaq is pretty steep---at least for now.  I am not going to dismiss him, and I am not going to crown him.  I feel that he can be good, but to those who think he is going to be the MLB, I do not see it. It would turn an above average OLB into an average to below average MLB. (I do not know if people are still saying it, but after he signed his contract, people were.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s right. He’ll have to step up big time. Like...top 5 best 4-3 OLB in the league...minimum. Because that’s what his contract reflects.

Not saying he wasn’t decent, but he was never one of the best. Now he’ll have to be, he’ll have to be better than he ever was.

Frankly I don’t see it. Over and over and over again we have examples of Hurney paying big money due to desperation. Losing Luke caused an all too familiar scenario, Hurney got desperate and paid.

I’m not sure why the huge contract, it doesn’t make sense...I’ve always though Shaq has recently hit his ceiling, but according to Hurney and the contract he gave Shaq, this isn’t close to being true. Hope that’s right. Otherwise we get fuged again by Hurney and us fans who have been around a while knows damn well which is more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Stats?  My eyes dont lie.  But cool man if you think he is going to be some all pro or what not.  Nothing really stands out about him.  He was a project when he was drafted and has never developed into what they thought.  His contract is pretty nuts as well

 

Shaq had arguably his best year last season, even outplaying Luke (who admittedly had a down year).  His contract is 8Th among OLB, yet he is the youngest by far of the 7 in front of him.  People want to give Luke a pass for a terrible year because of a bad DL, bad coaching, etc.  yet Shaq had an even better year despite those things.  Shaq is not average.  He’s an above average OLB who is only 26 years old.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

This team has had Thomas Davis, Sam Mills, Dan Morgan, Luke Kuechly, and Jon Beason.  I think the dropoff between these names and Shaq is pretty steep---at least for now.  I am not going to dismiss him, and I am not going to crown him.  I feel that he can be good, but to those who think he is going to be the MLB, I do not see it. It would turn an above average OLB into an average to below average MLB. (I do not know if people are still saying it, but after he signed his contract, people were.)

 

Nah-he needs to stay at OLB.  Whitehead will be the MLB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...