Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers waive Scarlett


ncfan

Recommended Posts

MartyMagic,!!!11!!!1!1 also another one of my "waaaay too early" 53 man roster picks is wrong.

Like others I didnt like the pick, I know @stbugs hated it too(wanted DE Charles Owiinibvfaybrgcbarydncja) Then I heard a scout on the radio, reaaaaaly talk up this pick and it was a steal blah blah. Hearing that helped put a end my not agreeing with the pick. Now here we are one year later and hes cut.... Guess he didnt fit with what Rhule wanted and no one would even offer a 3rd string LB in return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered (since they kept Davis on a bad contract, if you ask me) if Scarlett would be the odd man out.  I was right---everybody--I called this to myself.

Seriously, He ran under a 4.5 and benched over 450 lbs coming out of college---so the work ethic argument could be the case, but smallish speedy RBs aren't born benching 450 lbs.    He just does not have the versatility?  I dunno.  In 2019, in four carries, he had 9 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I wondered (since they kept Davis on a bad contract, if you ask me) if Scarlett would be the odd man out.  I was right---everybody--I called this to myself.

Seriously, He ran under a 4.5 and benched over 450 lbs coming out of college---so the work ethic argument could be the case, but smallish speedy RBs aren't born benching 450 lbs.    He just does not have the versatility?  I dunno.  In 2019, in four carries, he had 9 yards.

Could hear in a few days he was popped for PEDs and they didnt want to wait. Also you can run 4.5/bench 450 and be lazy. Similar to if you take a bodybuilder and put him on a oil platform working next to other riggers. Most wouldnt last a day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I wondered (since they kept Davis on a bad contract, if you ask me) if Scarlett would be the odd man out.  I was right---everybody--I called this to myself.

Seriously, He ran under a 4.5 and benched over 450 lbs coming out of college---so the work ethic argument could be the case, but smallish speedy RBs aren't born benching 450 lbs.    He just does not have the versatility?  I dunno.  In 2019, in four carries, he had 9 yards.

I’m guessing his hands in the receiving game could be his downfall.  If Brady’s offense has a based around him catching the ball he could have just not gotten better at that.  He was working on it last year.  But you don’t easily change stone hands.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

I’m guessing his hands in the receiving game could be his downfall.  If Brady’s offense has a based around him catching the ball he could have just not gotten better at that.  He was working on it last year.  But you don’t easily change stone hands.  

This is what I suspect as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

People get so excited over players that will likely never be anything in the NFL. If he was worth having around, they would have kept him. 

I think mostly people like to bitch about the wasted pick because of the fantasy that we could have used that pick on someone else who would have been a stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope he finds his lane in year 2.  Now that we signed Walker, I'm really intrigued how Dan feels about the DL. Is there a piece there in R1 that presents value/BPA and fills a void for one of the spots w/ DB and Wharton.  I'll give Wharton another year to show us why he was signed here. With A'Shawn gone, I don't think BBIII is it.  Our edges are set and our LBs are balanced. Horn/Mike Jack and Moehrig will hold the secondary together. DB is, well...DB.  However, I think this is an area that is the biggest question mark right now. I see 1 of 3 spots that are locked and loaded for us. If we move to a 4 down front, I assume Phillips would slide down to be the additional linemen, but we still have questions about the other two spots in either scheme.  I'd feel better with a tradeback, but I do wonder how McDonald would do here. Maybe Woods....but McDonald really does peek my interest.  Or, can Jackson take that next step. The coaching staff speaks highly of him for what little he played. Here's hoping he stays healthy and comes into TC with something to prove. There's a spot to be taken, here's hoping he takes it.
    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
×
×
  • Create New...