Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any chance Luke un-retires?


NAS

Recommended Posts

If so, would it change your perception of this defense? I feel like we got used to having our secondary be our weakness as long as we had a stout DL and LBs. This year only our DL seems to be solid but glaring holes at other two levels.  If Luke was still on the team as a field genera alongside Shaql, I feel like this defense would be OK, good enough to not get blown out each game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NAS said:

If so, would it change your perception of this defense? I feel like we got used to having our secondary be our weakness as long as we had a stout DL and LBs. This year only our DL seems to be solid but glaring holes at other two levels.  If Luke was still on the team as a field genera alongside Shaql, I feel like this defense would be OK, good enough to not get blown out each game.

Possibly, but I think the odds of that happening are very long indeed. Our secondary looked pretty bad last year even with Bradberry and Luke on the field, so not sure Luke coming back would keep our heads above water by itself. As much as I hate it for our team, I think Luke made the right decision for himself, and I hope that he stand by it. With all of his knowledge and abilities I will be shocked if he does not find coaching success, and I think with his injury history that's the best path for him now. I just hope that success comes with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Possibly, but I think the odds of that happening are very long indeed. Our secondary looked pretty bad last year even with Bradberry and Luke on the field, so not sure Luke coming back would keep our heads above water by itself. As much as I hate it for our team, I think Luke made the right decision for himself, and I hope that he stand by it. With all of his knowledge and abilities I will be shocked if he does not find coaching success, and I think with his injury history that's the best path for him now. I just hope that success comes with us.

That was an uninspired defense playing a scheme that did not fit Luke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

That was an uninspired defense playing a scheme that did not fit Luke

Both true, but I still think Luke could only do so much if he were on the field this year. I think one of the things you saw with him last year was frustration at his inability to mask by himself all of the limitations of the defense he was stuck in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Both true, but I still think Luke could only do so much if he were on the field this year. I think one of the things you saw with him last year was frustration at his inability to mask by himself all of the limitations of the defense he was stuck in.

True but he had people running straight at him because of a porous D line that was historically bad against the run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...