Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Curtis Samuel be moved to RB?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Blink 182 Reaction GIF

He shouldn’t be our RB but it totally makes since to actually use him as the player he has always been. 

Samuel was always a weird pick for Carolina....because we drafted CMC before him.    CMC can do it all better than Samuel.  But Samuel was probably more RB than WR in college.  You gotta be selective when you insert him but can definitely be added to packages in the backfield. 

He averaged 6 yards a carry on 4 runs Sunday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

He shouldn’t be our RB but it totally makes since to actually use him as the player he has always been. 

Samuel was always a weird pick for Carolina....because we drafted CMC before him.    CMC can do it all better than Samuel.  But Samuel was probably more RB than WR in college.  You gotta be selective when you insert him but can definitely be added to packages in the backfield. 

He averaged 6 yards a carry on 4 runs Sunday 

The cmc and samuel pick was an idea. The idea was to get a player who could do both. Samuel is sort of a poor man's cmc. They ment to throw more darts at the board incase one didn't work out. I dont think either was a bad idea but with cmc looking all world it make samuel look worse. Samuel is a football player probably a number 2-3 guy but not a bust at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...