I know it's only been 1.5 games, but dare I say it...

[WarPanthers89]

2 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

I haven't said anything negative about McCaffrey. Stop being emotional. 

I’m not emotional. You just started a terrible thread and I called that out. Stop being emotional because I called it out.

[Mr. Scot]

3 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

Do we look better on offense the last two games? 

Better on defense actually, but the teams we've faced aren't exactly juggernauts either.

[RumHam]

38 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

We look better without CmC. 

 

I got destroyed for this last week

[Mr. Scot]

4 minutes ago, RumHam said:

I got destroyed for this last week

Deservedly.

[TheCasillas]

35 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

What kinda split on carries you think we will have going forward? 

Game plan determinant. You should never go into a game and say "CMC gets the ball this many times and Davis this many"

If you want overall touches... davis is a true spell back.

[Call Me James]

40 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

65-35 get CMC more involved in the passing game and in the slot with Davis in the backfield.

Yea I think that makes sense. 

 

34 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Gotta use Christian and Mike in tandem. We have no idea how high that ceiling is.

J stew d Angelo 2.0 vibes? I can dig it. 

[PantherKyle]

1 hour ago, SaltLifeAcrosstheBelly said:

We need an elite pass rusher. If we offered CMC for J.J. Watt, straight up, do you say no if you're Pittsburgh?

So many stupid things about this post lmao

[1of10Charnatives]

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

i wouldn't say we're better per se, but it could be the KB effect. once you don't have the main guy to feed it to you're forced to spread the ball around, and maybe that's made teddy a better player.

also the defense is playing much better

These things.

[1of10Charnatives]

1 hour ago, Call Me James said:

I haven't said anything negative about McCaffrey. Stop being emotional. 

Not directly but your post carries strong negative implications and that's pretty undeniable.  If you didn't want to be negative at all, the thread would have been something like: Offense finding a way to be potent and effective even without CMC.

Instead of what you posted comes across as a rush to declare us better without him, something you even acknowledge yourself in your title by admitting it's only been a game and a half.

[Pantherzack179812]

The issue with CMC is until a staff quits trying to give him the ball every other play, we will get repetitive and predictable. 

 

For God's sake, hes on the field 95% of the plays, CMC is not a short yardage back!!! Get his A$$ off the field on 2nd and 1...

[Carl Spackler]

25 minutes ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

The issue with CMC is until a staff quits trying to give him the ball every other play, we will get repetitive and predictable. 

 

For God's sake, hes on the field 95% of the plays, CMC is not a short yardage back!!! Get his A$$ off the field on 2nd and 1...

He’s been better on short yardage plays this season than any in his career. I’ve been impressed with his ability to score inside the 10 tbh. Also converted multiple third-and-shorts. 

[Carl Spackler]

3 hours ago, Call Me James said:

We look better without CmC. 

 

Did you think after Week 4 of last year that we looked better without Cam and with Kyle Allen?

[Carl Spackler]

So funny how yet another person who thought the Kyle Allen “hype train” was premature (it was) ignores the irony and applies the exact same logic one year later. 

We really are the dumbest country on earth. 

[mc52beast]

Maybe it’s just other guys knowing they have to step up, guys taking advantage of their limited snaps, coaches learning what their players are best at... this team is NOT better because CMC is sidelined.