Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears 2.5 underdogs


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

I prefer being the underdog but agree that the line is pretty much even considering we are the home team. 

We should beat the Bears this week. I don't personally think their 4-1 record is as strong as it appears. However, a W is a W and an L is an L, so they are still 4-1 regardless of how they win games. 

At some point there also has to be some Robby/"Who's That Bear" memes popping up for this game, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Soul Rebel said:

I prefer being the underdog but agree that the line is pretty much even considering we are the home team. 

We should beat the Bears this week. I don't personally think their 4-1 record is as strong as it appears. However, a W is a W and an L is an L, so they are still 4-1 regardless of how they win games. 

At some point there also has to be some Robby/"Who's That Bear" memes popping up for this game, right?

99_17126.thumb.jpg.668449050e74bf08e336567d9bfbeaea.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bears offense isn't that bad, they just aren't consistent.  They have had solid second half / fourth quarter performances.  

Our DBs have been good this year, and limiting Hopkins gives me hope, but A-Rob is a problem.  If Donte is out, I think he's got to be my biggest concern of the game, even more than Khalil Mack.  

Team-wise, you need to avoid the turnovers every game, but this game even more-so.  We can beat the Bears if we don't turn it over, but that defense is too good to overcome self-inflicted wounds.  Force their offense to beat us.  Take the 3 points.  I think this is one of those games where you just make sure you aren't over-thinking things and getting overly aggressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the home team shouldn't matter as much with no fans in the stadium.  Over than having to fly and stay in a hotel, what difference does it make.  And the Bears are only one time zone different, so its not like flying from the west coast and playing a 1pm eastern game.  

 

That being said, I hope we cover.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have without question one of the worst QB rooms in the league and your key concern is people having the audacity to be talking about it lol.
    • I saw this list crossing the screen waiting for any Panther.  Chubba, JC Horn and Hunt.  It was a crime to see so many that were not as good as these three.  ESPN is garbage anyhow.
    • Bingo!  We are on the same page.  Our scouting department was average under Hurney, but at least we hit hit it out of the park with our first rounders.  Our scouting department under Tepper's reign with his revolving doors of HCs and GMs has sucked because the scouts largely stay in place.  One or two may change every few years, but the core philosophy stays in place and I believe that to be heavily RAS influenced.    Looking the part of a football player (physical/athletic measurables) vastly outweighs putting on the tape and deep diving into his stats with our scouting department. Until we change that mindset, this team is doomed. Again, how many of us Huddlers (none of us are professional scouts) wanted McConkey over Legette? Yet, we went with XL.  Why?  RAS score, pure and simple.  If you put on the tape and look at the numbers without taking RAS into account, McConkey was the clear choice.
×
×
  • Create New...