Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Pick Update: #6


saX man

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, davos said:

Lance is a straight up toss-up.  I won't act like I've really seen his game but his youtube vids look super promising.  He seems to have all the tools and was the undisputed #3 until the Trask & Wilson machines took CFB by storm this season.

If I’m not mistaken, Mahomes was a bit of an enigma when he was drafted. He benefited from a year on the bench before he became a megastar. It’s possible Lance’s career takes a similar trajectory but it is a risk for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Prowler2k18 said:

If I’m not mistaken, Mahomes was a bit of an enigma when he was drafted. He benefited from a year on the bench before he became a megastar. It’s possible Lance’s career takes a similar trajectory but it is a risk for sure.

I like the gamble with Lance more than the gamble with Trask. The upside does remind me a bit of Mahomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, davos said:

I like the gamble with Lance more than the gamble with Trask. The upside does remind me a bit of Mahomes.

Agreed. I’m not too high on QBs coming out of FL - they never appear to live up to the hype. And while Trask has a nice arm, his athleticism is so-so. Not sure he can be considered a true franchise QB but I could be wrong.

I think we have the right staff and culture in place to bring aboard a young QB with limited experience but phenomenal upside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

If I’m not mistaken, Mahomes was a bit of an enigma when he was drafted. He benefited from a year on the bench before he became a megastar. It’s possible Lance’s career takes a similar trajectory but it is a risk for sure.

Mahomes also benefited a great deal from going to a team coached by Andy Reid.

Imagine if he'd gone to a team led by Ron Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mahomes also benefited a great deal from going to a team coached by Andy Reid.

Imagine if he'd gone to a team led by Ron Rivera.

Yeah, Mahomes is phenomenal but so is Andy Reid with developing QBs. Mahomes is what happens when you give Andy Reid a super talented super coachable lump of clay to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

Lance is a straight up toss-up.  I won't act like I've really seen his game but his youtube vids look super promising.  He seems to have all the tools and was the undisputed #3 until the Trask & Wilson machines took CFB by storm this season.


this is the best breakdown of his college tape I’ve found. It’s an hour long but very good info. These guys were super excited about him. Pro comped him as the next Steve McNair. The guy was doing things a three year starter is doing as a freshman. His trajectory is way up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

Yep, hence why I'm expecting him the 4th or 5th QB taken and more in our range barring a trade-up

Of course I wouldn’t be upset if a QB-needy team e.g. the Bears were willing to trade up for Lance in exchange for a bevy of picks this year and next. I could actually see us making this trade if Lance is there at our pick. How’s that for draft day drama?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, t96 said:

Hindsight is 20/20 and obviously Trubisky was a massive bust but before the draft he was widely regarded as the best QB in the draft. Not really comparable.

He might have been the best QB of that draft but that doesn't mean he would be higher rated than QB3 and QB4 in this draft.  

Fans tend to evaluate players in a vacuum within their current draft class, evaluators don't.  Teams could easily have a higher grade on Wilson or Lance than they did on Trubisky.  

My only point is I think you are undervaluing the chance that a team would take or trade up to the top 5 for QB 3 or 4 in this draft class, but like you said we'll see in a few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...