Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Honestly think Tepper is Fed up with teddy as well


Calboyz13

Recommended Posts

Looks like it’s going to be a FULL SEND boys on quarterback because Tepper has realized teddy ain’t it.. and theirs a reason why they made teddy’s contract cutable and before you guys start saying Wilson go look at the full game on YouTube of him playing against Coastal Carolina 

492B7BFA-13D7-4478-938A-A85336F5B64F.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Calboyz13 said:

Looks like it’s going to be a FULL SEND boys on quarterback because Tepper has realized teddy ain’t it.. and theirs a reason why they made teddy’s contract cutable and before you guys start saying Wilson go look at the full game on YouTube of him playing against Coastal Carolina 

492B7BFA-13D7-4478-938A-A85336F5B64F.jpeg

Eh, one game isn’t going to make me not want him. Same thing with Lance or Fields. I would still take all 3 in a heartbeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Eh, one game isn’t going to make me not want him. Same thing with Lance or Fields. I would still take all 3 in a heartbeat. 

Also Wilson didn't play bad at all that game. His receivers dropped a ton of passes, his line didn't block, and he was still within a yard of winning. 

BYU as a whole played bad, but Wilson was one of the few who didn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is some grand pronouncement.  Very few players should be comfortable with their job security on a 4-10 team, and everything in the NFL begins with the Quarterback.

Outside of CMC, Robby, DJ, Moton (who we better keep), Burns, Chinn, Brown, & Shaq (while you might not agree with the contract, he has been good and he definitely is in the team plans next year), there is no one on the team that should be automatically slotted as a starter.

I like Teddy, but objectively he has regressed since that knee tweak.  Right now it's hard to see a wide gap in play between Teddy and what we had last year with a 2nd-year UDFA in Kyle Allen.

It's not conducive to winning football.

I don't know if the draft is the best option given our other needs (unless there is a guy they feel confident in outside of Trevor Lawrence cause we ain't getting him), but we can't go into next year IMO with Teddy as the unquestioned starter.

That being said, while I don't think Teddy can get us to a Super Bowl, he's probably going to be on the team next year, and with a decent chance of starting.

I do honestly believe had CMC been healthy all year, we are closer to 8-8 than not (although it's better for us long-term to have a higher draft pick this year).

So the question becomes, should we continue to add to the team with Teddy or another FA QB, or go for broke and draft what we hope will be another franchise QB.  

I do believe Teddy can get a team to 10-11 wins in the right circumstances.  A whiff on a QB that you spend top 5 draft capital on can set you back years.

It is a tough decision.  And as fans, there are a million opinions.  All we can do is hope Rhule, Tepper, and whoever else can get it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Inside sources say tepper is demanding we trade up for Lawrence.

You have to have a willing partner to do so.  

Lawrence would be amazing for this franchise (and any other) from not only a football standpoint but it would be a marketing coup for Tepper with the Clemson ties.

Jacksonville is not blind to this, either.  If I'm the owner of the Jags (Shahid Khan), I'm threatening to fire anyone who jeopardizes the Jaguars tank the last 2 games.

Unfortunately, I don't believe even with Tepper's money he is going to be able to work this deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Seltzer said:

You have to have a willing partner to do so.  

Lawrence would be amazing for this franchise (and any other) from not only a football standpoint but it would be a marketing coup for Tepper with the Clemson ties.

Jacksonville is not blind to this, either.  If I'm the owner of the Jags (Shahid Khan), I'm threatening to fire anyone who jeopardizes the Jaguars tank the last 2 games.

Unfortunately, I don't believe even with Tepper's money he is going to be able to work this deal

Jags haven't had any luck as QB in the draft for the past... ever, why would that start now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Jags haven't had any luck as QB in the draft for the past... ever, why would that start now?

I'm 100% positive they will give it another shot with Lawrence.

Seriously, if the Panthers were in the same situation as the Jaguars, would you consider any trade to not draft Lawrence?  I don't think I would.

What would KC trade Mahomes for right now?  There is no amount.

If Lawrence has a chance to be that good, there simply is no justification from a football standpoint.

And given where they are as a franchise, they need the spark of drafting a guy like Lawrence more than draft picks.

I really do hope the Panthers inquire about trading up for Lawrence, I just honestly don't see any scenario where the Jaguars even consider trading the pick, much less considering what it would take in terms of draft capital to do so and how much it could potentially handcuff the Panthers going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • agreed. reich and fox were kind of similar in that i think their comfort zone with QBs were established vets.  any rookie QB would have been outside that. i do think that he might have been more comfortable with stroud than young, but i also still think that we would have been stuck in a bad place. there was more than went wrong than with the QB. nothing worked and QB issues were one of many symptoms of the problem that we found ourselves in with reich. the whole thing was too much for him. not only did he get a QB outside of his comfort zone, he got unfamiliar assistants that came from unfamiliar schemes. he had no prior relationship with most coaches he had added to his staff.  again, that staff was tepper's idea...get the dream staff with a billion years of experience and those who don't have a poo ton of experience were coaches that were considered up and comers for HC jobs.  reich is a mild-mannered passive likeable kind of guy. he wasn't the big dominant personality that would be needed to handle that staff.
    • I can't blame anyone in sports media for not believing we've made a big enough jump talent wise to compete. I mean let's be realistic. In the eyes of many of us here we were improved on paper under Scott Fitterer each offseason the last few years. Just because we're once again buying in doesn't mean the rest of the sports world will also. Then you go back to preseason last year and the downplaying of how horrific we looked not just offensively but as a whole. If we look competent in preseason  I will begin to feel some level of confidence about the direction of the team and so will those in the sports world. Until then nothing we've done matters.
    • Yeah we don't have a beast mode, and Bryce doesn't threaten with the play action/scramble deep shots. That's the majority of the reason that formula worked in Seattle during that stretch. I hope Brooks is a good back, but he's definitely not a beast mode type. 
×
×
  • Create New...