Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper said he will be the tiebreaker if needed


NAS

Recommended Posts

I like that Tepper is agressive in choosing the right folks to build a winning organization , but I really don’t want him meddling in roster decisions or who we draft. I didn’t like hearing he may have to be the tiebreaker between Rhule and the new GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a couple of choices on that front. Either you give one guy full power or you step in yourself, but only when necessary.

In the past, the guy at the top was about always the GM, but more and more these days coaches have a higher level of influence. That's where you get guys like Matt Rhule who say they're not just about X's and O's.

The middle ground for me is having an owner who steps in when needed, but only if he's asked. I understand that he owns the team, but he should also understand that doesn't make him a smart football guy. He's the guy who hires smart football guys and lets them do their jobs.

So basically, stay out of the day to day stuff, but step in if your people can't come to a consensus.

And if your people hardly ever come to a consensus, find new people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I like that Tepper is agressive in choosing the right folks to build a winning organization , but I really don’t want him meddling in roster decisions or who we draft. I didn’t like hearing he may have to be the tiebreaker between Rhule and the new GM. 

What do you suggest? Paper rock scissors two out of three?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...