Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So was Hurney the one that decided to cut Cam?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

Premise: Marty Hurney insisted on cutting Cam.

Supporting lines of reasoning:

(1) Hurney was fired for making poor, gutty decisions instead of being will to integrate data analytics into his decision-making process; 

(2) @RoaringRiot has confirmed Hurney is the one that insisted on Bridgewater, a hill he was willing to die on;

(3) Tepper, Rhule, and Brady seemed very high on Cam leading up to his release;

(4) Hurney seems to have had more shot-calling power than any of us originally suspected.

 

None of these lines of reasoning are anywhere close to what's needed to form a solid conclusion - e.g. that Marty Hurney insisted on jettisoning Cam in favor of Bridgewater, a move that ultimately got him fired - but it's an interesting thought and as a narrative would explain some things we don't currently have explanations for. What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope not because if Tepper, Rhule and Brady were high on Cam with the giant turd he is taking in NE, that’s worse judgment than TB

Now if what you mean by high on him as in sending him out on his last year as a lame duck to save cap space and dump him after the year to draft the franchise QB with an extra 40m they gave TB, that would have been nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, onmyown said:

I hope not because if Tepper, Rhule and Brady were high on Cam with the giant turd he is taking in NE, that’s worse judgment than TB

Now if what you mean by high on him as in sending him out on his last year as a lame duck to save cap space and dump him after the year to draft the franchise QB with an extra 40m they gave TB, that would have been nice

I never thought I’d say this but Cam would’ve faired better here than NE. The talent on offense there is terrible. Plus we would’ve saved money to see how it played out. 
 

you can’t just look at the offense in New England and say cam would’ve been the same here. There are ten other guys on the field. That matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, onmyown said:

I hope not because if Tepper, Rhule and Brady were high on Cam with the giant turd he is taking in NE, that’s worse judgment than TB

in spite of his occasional stinkers i'd say cam had a better year than teddy on a MUCH worse team. if the patriots had our wide receiver corps they'd be in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know people have said Brady insisted on Bridgewater and wouldn’t join the Panthers if we didn’t get him. I always found that bull. 
Before the season Hurney seemed very confident we could make the playoffs with this team. 
As much as people think Rhule had a ton of control I think he didn’t have as much as people thought. 
Brown was a Hurney pick. Bridgewater felt like a Hurney signing, the bloated contract definitely was vintage Hurney. CMC mega contract was a mistake, Shaqs contract as well. 
Hurney is old fashioned. Which I always interpreted as: Hurney builds the team with some input from he coach but Hurney has the final say and the coach tries to work with what Hurney gives him. Which for 3 years hasn’t worked at all and resulted in worsening records. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always felt like Hurney was in a weird position. Like he had way too much power but also here’s an unbreakable 7 year contract with an unknown college coach that may go down as a glorious dumpster fire. 

Used to be the GM had a big say in picking the coach but increasingly around the league there is no rhyme or reason to the organizational hierarchy. 

Either way at least Hurney is gone. He is awful at his job and has been since his first stint and there was zero, O, zero zero zero reason to bring him back in the first place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

in spite of his occasional stinkers i'd say cam had a better year than teddy on a MUCH worse team. if the patriots had our wide receiver corps they'd be in the playoffs. 

if by team you mean wide receivers and HB, you are correct

the rest of the team though...it’s statistically just isn’t true

but whether he played better here or not isn’t the main point - it’s neither here nor there because they way Cam is playing overall is not worth an extension and having cap tied up in him at his age and injury history, he isn’t the same, and especially with a new coach, GM, and system in place.
 

an extension would have been a horrible move for this franchise, drafting our new, next franchise QB was always meant to be so we can compete for years to come on a rookie deal...time to let go and embrace that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam with Moore/Anderson/CMC/David/Samuel would have been nice to see.

Funny that we cut Cam in the same offseason when we finally fill the holes he needed help with for years.

If TB is 0/7 on game winning drives I believe Cam would probably win at least 3-4 of those just on big balls swag alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Like he had way too much power but also here’s an unbreakable 7 year contract with an unknown college coach that may go down as a glorious dumpster fire.

 

3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Used to be the GM had a big say in picking the coach but increasingly around the league there is no rhyme or reason to the organizational hierarchy. 

Not enough credence given to either of these very real statements. 

Now that Hurney is gone, how much longer does the Rhule honeymoon last?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a huge Mahomes fan. I love watching him play and I think he’s gonna go down as one of the greatest. He’s like the MJ of football to me. But I’m not naive to think that he did not land in the absolute perfect situation to maximize his talent and coaching with Andy Reid. That team was stacked offensively before he was drafted, he was just the missing piece to take them over the hill. Do I think Mahomes would still be great if he went to the worst team in the league? Yes but I don’t think we’d see him in the same light because team play matters, even with the greats. Montana had monster talents, young had monster talents, Brady had monster talents. The greats had talent around them and were put in great situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...