Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need a new QB Coach

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

What matters are Ws.  What matters are TDs which should be the end result of those red zone trips 

either Brady didn’t scheme properly or Bridgewater, his hand picked QB, didn’t execute 

Either way, the offense was his responsibility 

again, one has to ask, where there no durations on the contract and if not, why not.  Brady screwed LSU after saying he would stay 

have to wonder why all the offensive defections after one season 

could it be Rhule hit some nerves.  Could it be they didn’t like Rhule or they didn’t like the nfl grind 

isn’t this highly unusual after one season?

When a QB coach moves to an OC position it’s not hard to imagine his assistant moves up with him. Same way Snow and others followed him to Baylor and here.

Are we losing more than just one guy and his buddy? Seems not that unusual and half of it is because LSU fired their OC. If they hadn’t had a bad year we might not have lost anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Prowler2k18 Grand Master

Prowler2k18

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Confirmed Mangas is leaving with him...

We interviewed three guys last year before settling on Peetz: Ben McAdoo, Scott Linehan and Mike McCoy. Pretty sure all are still available (which might not be a great sign).

There's also Lions QB Coach Sean Ryan. He's an old colleague of Matt Rhule was speculated to be our OC choice before we got Brady. Mind you, it's still possible we might need an OC as well.

For what it's worth, Jim Caldwell is free as well.

Jim Caldwell would be good but I’d prefer Ryan. Of course, if we lose Brady, Rhule may want reach out to Ryan again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, stbugs said:

None. Nada and neither did ours.

We had 4 people with 1000 total yards. Only Moore and Anderson had 1000 yards receiving and that’s been done dozens of times before. Heck there have been a few teams with 3 1000 yard WRs.

Not sure how many teams have had 4 1000 total yards guys but I’d have to assume the Rams and Lions did it when they had 3 1000 yard receivers and had Faulk and Sanders.

I don't think the Rams ever had 4 players with 1000 scrimmage yards. Not sure they ever even had 3 1000 yard receivers in a season, and if they did it would've included Faulk and they didn't have a RB anywhere near 1000 yards behind Faulk any of those seasons.

 

I'd honestly be pretty surprised if any other team in the SB era had 4 players with 1000+ scrimmage yards. It's actually pretty incredible and hard to believe. Still hoping someone in the media or who has access to all the stats in league history looks into this and reports on it, but not holding my breath. If we were a playoff team this stat would be all over the sports headlines...

 

EDIT: guess I was wrong, did a bit of digging myself and found a few other teams who had 4 1000+ yard players:

'89 Redskins

'95 Falcons

'04 Colts

 

I doubt there are many others though. There were 2 other teams with 3 1000 yard receivers but they didn't have any other players with 1000+ scrimmage yards (makes sense that a team whose passing offense is good enough to have 3 1000 yard receivers didn't have a 1000 yard running back...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

What matters are Ws.  What matters are TDs which should be the end result of those red zone trips 

either Brady didn’t scheme properly or Bridgewater, his hand picked QB, didn’t execute 

Either way, the offense was his responsibility 

again, one has to ask, where there no durations on the contract and if not, why not.  Brady screwed LSU after saying he would stay 

have to wonder why all the offensive defections after one season 

could it be Rhule hit some nerves.  Could it be they didn’t like Rhule or they didn’t like the nfl grind 

isn’t this highly unusual after one season?

Isn't it normal for 5 win teams to get their coaches poached

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, t96 said:

I don't think the Rams ever had 4 players with 1000 scrimmage yards. Not sure they ever even had 3 1000 yard receivers in a season, and if they did it would've included Faulk and they didn't have a RB anywhere near 1000 yards behind Faulk any of those seasons.

 

I'd honestly be pretty surprised if any other team in the SB era had 4 players with 1000+ scrimmage yards. It's actually pretty incredible and hard to believe. Still hoping someone in the media or who has access to all the stats in league history looks into this and reports on it, but not holding my breath. If we were a playoff team this stat would be all over the sports headlines...

Yeah, Hakim only got to 750 (Proehl sniped 441 yards as WR4). If you include total yards with punt returns he was way over. I mentioned them as I thought they were one of the teams that had three 1000 WRs. Looks like the Lions in 1996 got close as well but Morton only had 749 yards. Sanders and Faulk did have way more yards than Davis so that hurt them.

2004 Colts did it. James, Harrison, Wayne and Stokely. All 3 WRs had over 1000 receiving. James even had over 2000 total yards so they did a wee bit more than us. Manning also had 34 more TDs than Teddy. You gotta wonder how Teddy was able to keep his TDs under 16.

I will also add an honorable mention as I think it dwarfs our 4 1000 yard guys was that Manning in 2013 had another ridiculous year. Only 3 1000 yard guys but there were 3 more guys over 700 total yards. 6 over 700 and 3 of those over 1000. That’s video game numbers. Unreal that Seattle tore them a new one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted

Interesting looking up some other old teams.

1980 Chargers in came close with 3 1000 yard receivers but they split the RB load and actually had 4 RBs combine for over 2500 total yards. Bit more than Davis/CMC.

1989 Redskins did have 4 over 1000 total yards and a 5th over 900.

1995 Falcons had 4 over 1000 as well.

2008 Cardinals had 3 1000 WRs but like the Chargers did a RBBC that had almost 1700 total yards.

No idea if it’s happened more but at least 3 other teams did it and a few came close and dwarfed our totals but split carries/catches up more. Our offense was basically 4 guys before and after CMC got hurt.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Yeah, Hakim only got to 750 (Proehl sniped 441 yards as WR4). If you include total yards with punt returns he was way over. I mentioned them as I thought they were one of the teams that had three 1000 WRs. Looks like the Lions in 1996 got close as well but Morton only had 749 yards. Sanders and Faulk did have way more yards than Davis so that hurt them.

2004 Colts did it. James, Harrison, Wayne and Stokely. All 3 WRs had over 1000 receiving. James even had over 2000 total yards so they did a wee bit more than us. Manning also had 34 more TDs than Teddy. You gotta wonder how Teddy was able to keep his TDs under 16.

I will also add an honorable mention as I think it dwarfs our 4 1000 yard guys was that Manning in 2013 had another ridiculous year. Only 3 1000 yard guys but there were 3 more guys over 700 total yards. 6 over 700 and 3 of those over 1000. That’s video game numbers. Unreal that Seattle tore them a new one.

Yeah see my edit above

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, t96 said:

Yeah see my edit above

Hah, I had already clicked reply just hadn’t finished looking through some other teams and in some cases marveling at the offenses. One thing for sure, we did the 4 by the skin of our teeth as we basically had 0 other contributors. Other teams I looked at had 3-4 other guys who were contributing 30-50 yards a game as well. That’s why most of the teams in my posts were top offenses and we were in the 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...