Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Haskins...or Heinicke?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I say neither. Truth he told, I think Heinicke basically caught lightning in a bottle last night with that performance. We're already dedicated to giving Teddy $20M next year whether he's on the roster or not and there's a very good chance we'll have a top 10 rookie at QB too.

Heinicke will likely be re-signed in Washington and maybe even given a chance to compete for the starting job next year. Not like they have much of anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I say neither. Truth he told, I think Heinicke basically caught lightning in a bottle last night with that performance. We're already dedicated to giving Teddy $20M next year whether he's on the roster or not and there's a very good chance we'll have a top 10 rookie at QB too.

Heinicke will likely be re-signed in Washington and maybe even given a chance to compete for the starting job next year. Not like they have much of anything else.

Yeah no interest in Heinicke whatsoever. I don’t want Haskins either but atleast he does have the upside that made him a top 15 pick just a few years ago. Heinicke will never be a starter and we need to focus on looking for our franchise starting QB before thinking about a long term backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, Zod said:

I read this morning that he was. Perhaps the article was wrong.

He doesn't have a lot of years to his credit so I'd imagine it's possible.

A couple of Washington reporters have confirmed he'd like to stay up there though, and teammates seem to like the idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER Newbie

GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER

Posted
Posted

haskins has better career numbers and he’s 4 years younger. with a 23 year old former first round pick as your backup the hope is that he can be a developmental project. with taylor heinicke as your backup you’re locked into eating up a roster spot with a JAG. you’re not winning poo with either so you might as well take the long view or alternatively sign neither of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Rookies

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • shaqattaq
      WE WIN FUG BAKER MAYFIELD THREAD!

      By shaqattaq · Posted

      And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • MHS831
      I’m starting to believe Nijman….

      By MHS831 · Posted

      If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...