Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Games Thread


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

We took a big step forward this season and I love the future.  Mitch is a great GM but now the hard part starts.  Huge decisions on these guard contracts and have to get a center.  Will be interesting but I fuggin love the potential of this squad.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He also threw the team under the bus the other day saying you can't win without making shots. It's true but prob pissed the team off and want him gone

He’s right...we had wide open looks both sat and sun to win both games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ENCPantherfan2 said:

So basically it's like the Panthers going from John Fox to Ron Rivera. At this point who is the NCAAB version of Matt Rhule?

Look at Brad stevens with the Celtics....this is a players league...if your players don’t perform you won’t win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Look at Brad stevens with the Celtics....this is a players league...if your players don’t perform you won’t win

Boston has been hit with crazy injuries but Danny Ainge is an amazing GM.  He knows talent better than any GM out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Lets just say it...the NBA superstars decide who wins ships.  I hope not this year but like 4 teams have a shot every year.  Its rigged.

I normally don’t buy in on any conspiracy theories but ever since we got hosed by stern on AD I’m not gonna dismiss it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

I normally don’t buy in on any conspiracy theories but ever since we got hosed by stern on AD I’m not gonna dismiss it

I mean Embiid, Giannis, and Steph were all drafted by their current teams. They attract free agents from being in good GM/Coach situations. Lakers and Nets are playing that Superstar free agent stuff and it's kinda working but not a lock for a championship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...