Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer roster philosophy in terms of importance and team building...


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Seattle has had a trash O line the last 5 years. 

 

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

its true truth GIF

 

3 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

I was reading that quote and legit raised my eye brows. Well then, that seems wrong. LOL. 

They allowed Russel to cover up a lot of the deficiencies of the O-line.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interviewing personnel people is a lot like interviewing coordinators.

How much credit does Eric Bieniemy deserve for the Chiefs successes or failures as opposed to Andy Reid? Same question with Fitterer, Carroll and Schneider. There's just no way to know.

We'll find out once he starts building a roster.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Interviewing personnel people is a lot like interviewing coordinators.

How much credit does Eric Bieniemy deserve for the Chiefs successes or failures as opposed to Andy Reid? Same question with Fitterer, Carroll and Schneider. There's just no way to know.

We'll find out once he starts building a roster.

With our flat structure, even then, it will impossible to decide who is responsible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said that way back because it is true. Teams aren’t trading what appears to be a can’t miss prospect.    In an extremely rare scenario like they have an established QB and maybe got the pick in a trade. Sort of like the Bears but with a better incumbent. If they’s have had someone significantly better than Fields they might have cashed in. 
    • So you're saying you'd still go back and take the inferior talents, just because you think they fit with Bryce better, a player who is more likely than not, to no longer be a Panther next year? That's just crazy to say, wanting to have a worse player because you think they fit better with your awful QB is just dumb.  You take the best players, if your existing players then aren't good enough, you replace them later. It's crazy that there are still people with this take after they've seen what T-Mac can do for us in just 5 games so far.
    • I have seen Bryce make some outstanding throws but what he is up against is even when the WRs get a little separation, that tightens up while the ball is in the air. By degrees depending on the distance. Not as critical on the short stuff. 
×
×
  • Create New...