Stafford Available

[MHS831]

I think we will trade up---teams at the back of the draft that need QB will go after Stafford and give up a lot.  Why do I sense Indy making a deal with Detroit?  Or New England? Washington? 

[MHS831]

Trade Thompson to Detroit--they need help on D.

[BurnNChinn]

9 minutes ago, KidSmitty89 said:

If we lose out on the top 4 QB. I rather we trade back get as many picks as possible. Build a stronger foundation and go all out for  Howell or Rattler

Yeah and win another 5 or 6 games hell no I’m tired of that sh@t.

[NanuqoftheNorth]

New GM wants to upgrade QB/DB position and build out the lines.

Picking up Stafford would allow us to do that and remain within budget without trading one of our better young players away.

Win, win and win.

Edited January 23, 2021 by NanuqoftheNorth

[RJK]

Stafford would be a good get if this team was just a QB away. But they’re not. Stafford doesn’t make it 16 games behind this oline 

[Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.]

I guess Stafford wasn't into biting anyone's kneecaps. 

 

Look, we don't need a QB who turns 33 next month. Stafford will be a really good backup somewhere. This team needs to develop youth.

[BurnNChinn]

6 minutes ago, Liminy said:

l don't mind Stafford coming here if it's for nothing big. If we can't get Watson, Stafford could come in and probably have a good year just from the change of scenery and better talent around him. I can't see him lasting longer than a year, we need to have his replacement in this draft if we go the Stafford route.

That’s nonsense lol last only a year!

[ncfan]

So right now

 

QB is a lock at 1-2 (Lawerence and Wilson/Fields)

The Lions are ahead of us and are taking a QB.

 

Falcons?

[TLGPanthersFan]

Well looks like we need to trade up even more now. 
I really don’t want Stafford. Why or why did we have to win that stupid Washington game. 

[BurnNChinn]

Just now, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

I guess Stafford wasn't into biting anyone's kneecaps. 

 

Look, we don't need a QB who turns 33 next month. Stafford will be a really good backup somewhere. This team needs to develop youth.

He is a starter not a backup lol, y’all rather give up everything for Watson and have nobody on this team. This makes a lot of sense for this team. Then use picks to build this line and team

[BurnNChinn]

People can forget trading up, that is not happening I would bet that in a second. U better hope we get Stafford or someone falls if not we stuck with Bridgewater again

[Growl]

2 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

New GM wants to upgrade QB/DB position and build out the lines.

Picking up Stafford would allow us to do that and remain within budget without trading one of our better young players away.

Win, win and win.

i also would relegate my "in budget" moves to the QB position

[Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.]

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

He is a starter not a backup lol, y’all rather give up everything for Watson and have nobody on this team. This makes a lot of sense for this team. Then use picks to build this line and team

Hell no trading anything for Stafford would be rediculous. The Lions have already stated he isn't in their plans. At least wait for him to be released.

[BurnNChinn]

Just now, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Hell no trading anything for Stafford would be rediculous. The Lions have already stated he isn't in their plans. At least wait for him to be released.

He is not going to get released someone will trade a pick for him sorry.