-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By PNW_PantherMan · Posted
Its not a bad idea but they shouldn't have taken a guy that will be 28 by the time he plays. -
yeah for example the Green Bay & San Fransico model of drafting your young Qb 2 to 3 years prior to starting for the established vet has been a successful philosophy to follow in years past ... Montana...Young Favre...Rodgers maybe yeah just maybe Cousins...Penix makes sense...just saying -
By Davidson Deac II · Posted
I get what they are doing, going for long term sustained success instead of short term gain. Cousins gives them the ability to compete now, and in two or three years, if they think Pennix can play, they cut or trade Cousins and go with Pennix for the foreseeable future. Akin to what Green Bay did with Favre, Rogers, and now Love. If it works out for Green Bay and Atlanta, might see other teams do the same thing. Personally, I wish we had let Cam play out his contract and drafted a younger guy that same year, instead of cutting cam and the ridiculous signing of TB.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.