Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teams already reaching out to Detroit for Stafford


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, davos said:

He still has quite a zip and has always been able to launch rockets.  Crazy to think he's only a year older than Cam. Been steady at ~65% with throwing a lot of bombs to Golladay and Jones. 

It is pretty damn interesting to consider how he would do with a guy like CMC on his team.  He's never had that before.

We could do a lot worse.  I would at least talk to Stafford's agent to see if there's mutual interest.  If there's is I would keep an eye on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Indy?  went 11-5 and QB just retired.  Patriots? WFT?  Denver?

There are plenty of teams you could see Stafford as a good upgrade and from the outside looking in we don't look as appealing as a lot of the fans on this forum think.

 

 

 

 

We got better skill position players surrounding the QB than all 4 of those teams.  

All depends what you are looking for.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

We got better skill position players surrounding the QB than all 4 of those teams.  

 

and we won 5 games.  I get being a homer, but really, lets try to somewhat realistic.

Indy went 11-5.  Pittsburg went 12-4.  Patriots have won the Super Bowl.  I'm not super sold on WFT but they did win the division, and had a better record then us.  None of the other teams in that division look stable so he might view that as favorable

We aren't nearly the FA destination that a lot of the fans think.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AU-panther said:

and we won 5 games.  I get being a homer, but really, lets try to somewhat realistic.

Indy went 11-5.  Pittsburg went 12-4.  Patriots have won the Super Bowl.  I'm not super sold on WFT but they did win the division, and had a better record then us.  None of the other teams in that division look stable so he might view that as favorable

We aren't nearly the FA destination that a lot of the fans think.  

 

 

Yeah, we won 5 games....because we didn’t have a decent QB.  QB league. 

you think we win 5 games if you flip flop Teddy and Tom Brady this season? We are in the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah, we won 5 games....because we didn’t have a decent QB.  QB league. 

you think we win 5 games if you flip flop Teddy and Tom Brady this season? We are in the playoffs.  

Your fandom is cute.

and WFT won more than us without a QB

Pittsburg won more than us without a QB

Patriots won more than us without a QB

Indy won 11 games with Rivers, do you seriously not think that Stafford considers himself as good as Rivers.

Denver won more than us without a QB.

San Fran won more than us without a QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

He is from the south.  College ball at GA.  The Carolinas are nicer than Detroit.   No snow. Cost of living is good. 

and we had 3 WRs go over 1000 total yards last year...and CMC.  No team will offer a better set of skill position players. 

that’s the pitch. 

 

Pretty good pitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We also have to remember that he doesn't get to pick.

The split seems somewhat amicable, I would think they will work with him to some degree.

They aren't going to give him away for nothing, also I'm sure they would like to keep him out of the division, but I expect them to work to help them get to somewhere he wants to be.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Your fandom is cute.

and WFT won more than us without a QB

Pittsburg won more than us without a QB

Patriots won more than us without a QB

Indy won 11 games with Rivers, do you seriously not think that Stafford considers himself as good as Rivers.

Denver won more than us without a QB.

San Fran won more than us without a QB.

 

I specifically said we had better skill position players surrounding the QB than the teams you listed (now your adding Pitt and SF)   You never named one equipped with better skill position guys of the 4. 

Thinking Tom Brady wins more games in Carolina than Teddy isn’t being a Panther homer. We were in every game late....with a bad QB and no CMC.   QB driven league.  It matters.  

and I’m not buying into this silly narrative that is proven false every year ....that it takes years to contend.  You can become a contender or fall off the map overnight in today’s NFL in most scenarios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rams since you beat them already and they are 0-2 on the road against NFC South teams.
    • Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...