Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teams already reaching out to Detroit for Stafford


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, davos said:

He still has quite a zip and has always been able to launch rockets.  Crazy to think he's only a year older than Cam. Been steady at ~65% with throwing a lot of bombs to Golladay and Jones. 

It is pretty damn interesting to consider how he would do with a guy like CMC on his team.  He's never had that before.

We could do a lot worse.  I would at least talk to Stafford's agent to see if there's mutual interest.  If there's is I would keep an eye on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Indy?  went 11-5 and QB just retired.  Patriots? WFT?  Denver?

There are plenty of teams you could see Stafford as a good upgrade and from the outside looking in we don't look as appealing as a lot of the fans on this forum think.

 

 

 

 

We got better skill position players surrounding the QB than all 4 of those teams.  

All depends what you are looking for.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

We got better skill position players surrounding the QB than all 4 of those teams.  

 

and we won 5 games.  I get being a homer, but really, lets try to somewhat realistic.

Indy went 11-5.  Pittsburg went 12-4.  Patriots have won the Super Bowl.  I'm not super sold on WFT but they did win the division, and had a better record then us.  None of the other teams in that division look stable so he might view that as favorable

We aren't nearly the FA destination that a lot of the fans think.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AU-panther said:

and we won 5 games.  I get being a homer, but really, lets try to somewhat realistic.

Indy went 11-5.  Pittsburg went 12-4.  Patriots have won the Super Bowl.  I'm not super sold on WFT but they did win the division, and had a better record then us.  None of the other teams in that division look stable so he might view that as favorable

We aren't nearly the FA destination that a lot of the fans think.  

 

 

Yeah, we won 5 games....because we didn’t have a decent QB.  QB league. 

you think we win 5 games if you flip flop Teddy and Tom Brady this season? We are in the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah, we won 5 games....because we didn’t have a decent QB.  QB league. 

you think we win 5 games if you flip flop Teddy and Tom Brady this season? We are in the playoffs.  

Your fandom is cute.

and WFT won more than us without a QB

Pittsburg won more than us without a QB

Patriots won more than us without a QB

Indy won 11 games with Rivers, do you seriously not think that Stafford considers himself as good as Rivers.

Denver won more than us without a QB.

San Fran won more than us without a QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

He is from the south.  College ball at GA.  The Carolinas are nicer than Detroit.   No snow. Cost of living is good. 

and we had 3 WRs go over 1000 total yards last year...and CMC.  No team will offer a better set of skill position players. 

that’s the pitch. 

 

Pretty good pitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We also have to remember that he doesn't get to pick.

The split seems somewhat amicable, I would think they will work with him to some degree.

They aren't going to give him away for nothing, also I'm sure they would like to keep him out of the division, but I expect them to work to help them get to somewhere he wants to be.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Your fandom is cute.

and WFT won more than us without a QB

Pittsburg won more than us without a QB

Patriots won more than us without a QB

Indy won 11 games with Rivers, do you seriously not think that Stafford considers himself as good as Rivers.

Denver won more than us without a QB.

San Fran won more than us without a QB.

 

I specifically said we had better skill position players surrounding the QB than the teams you listed (now your adding Pitt and SF)   You never named one equipped with better skill position guys of the 4. 

Thinking Tom Brady wins more games in Carolina than Teddy isn’t being a Panther homer. We were in every game late....with a bad QB and no CMC.   QB driven league.  It matters.  

and I’m not buying into this silly narrative that is proven false every year ....that it takes years to contend.  You can become a contender or fall off the map overnight in today’s NFL in most scenarios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...