Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For all you new-school fans: Do I have to say it?


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

They really didn't though. Nate Burleson was sounding like a hater.

They really did though. The refs set the tone for the game in the first half.  KC not having their two starting tackles with Mike Remmers as the starting LT and it’s a recipe for disaster. Tampa’s defense is good, but they are not some historically elite super bowl championship level. 

Edited by TheRumGone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

Complete teams win championships.  I had a feeling going into the game that the Chiefs D was going to be their down fall.

It wasn't. It was their OL. The Bucs averaged 31ppg this year. They scored 31 points. The Chiefs' offense fell flat on their face because Mahomes was running for his life from the moment the ball was snapped just like Cam in SB50.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Terry McAulay was criticizing the calls on his Twitter.

Others like Boomer, Chris Simms and many more had a thing or two to say as well.

I saw bad defense on one side, and outstanding defense on the other. 

On an off note, I saw the Chiefs get away with several obvious holds. Blaming the refs in this game is weak! It takes away from an extraordinary defensive performance. That's just the way I see it.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

I saw bad defense on one side, and outstanding defense on the other. 

On an off note, I saw the Chiefs get away with several obvious holds. Blaming the refs in this game is weak! It takes away from an extraordinary defensive performance. That's just the way I see it.

There's a difference between blaming the refs and saying the refs were bad.

Poor officiating may have contributed, but there were many other factors which can be blamed on the Chiefs themselves.

With that said, the officiating in this game was horse sh-t, and that would have been true no matter who won the game.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

There's a difference between blaming the refs and saying the refs were bad.

Poor officiating may have contributed, but there were many other factors which can be blamed on the Chiefs themselves.

With that said, the officiating in this game was horse sh-t, and that would have been true no matter who won the game.

I think that officiating will prove to be an excuse only on message boards.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I think that officiating will prove to be an excuse only on message boards.

Wouldn't bet on that.

Sports talk, whether it's online, on radio or on TV is likely to be talking about how that game was officiated for a while.

It doesn't mean the Chiefs didn't deserve to lose, but any criticism the NFL gets for how crappy a job those refs did is justified.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...