Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Extreme inconsistencies"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think Goodell is getting close to retirement territory before something blows up in his face. If you have long time refs who know whats going on making public comments like this. Somethings up.

The "but within crews" blatantly hints at bookie style rigging potentially too.

Edited by Harbingers
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I would add that my impression of the female officials was positive.  They really did a solid job, based on my observations.  Better?  At times, equivalent--the rest of the time.  Hats off to them.

I noticed the same thing. The line judge lady was the one that correctly called that 4th down run on the goal line stop. My internal theory is she wasn’t down with the bias toward the Bradyneers because of what her being there meant in the bigger picture. Didn’t want to give anyone ammunition to say anything disparaging about a woman officiating.  Whether that’s true, or it’s a simple matter of she was the only competent one there and the rest of the officials sucked, good on her. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I noticed the same thing. The line judge lady was the one that correctly called that 4th down run on the goal line stop. My internal theory is she wasn’t down with the bias toward the Bradyneers because of what her being there meant in the bigger picture. Didn’t want to give anyone ammunition to say anything disparaging about a woman officiating.  Whether that’s true, or it’s a simple matter of she was the only competent one there and the rest of the officials sucked, good on her. 

And I think "How good did she have to be to overcome the bias that I am sure she faced?"  I saw the same thing you mentioned.  Her spots were accurate, and I imagine Mahommes is tough to mark on the sideline---

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Well, women are really good at pointing out what men do wrong.....

My wife calls me for personal fouls all the time--and "illegal motion," and "illegal procedure," and "interference."  I am leaving when she flags me for "too many men in the huddle."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

I think Goodell is getting close to retirement territory before something blows up in his face. If you have long time refs who know whats going on making public comments like this. Somethings up.

The "but within crews" blatantly hints at bookie style rigging potentially too.

god damn just stop posting lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I would add that my impression of the female officials was positive.  They really did a solid job, based on my observations.  Better?  At times, equivalent--the rest of the time.  Hats off to them.

If they are always "equivalent" and "at times better"...

...seems the league should go to 100% female officiating crews, no?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

My wife calls me for personal fouls all the time--and "illegal motion," and "illegal procedure," and "interference."  I am leaving when she flags me for "too many men in the huddle."

She’s probably really disappointed when you have a “false start”!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well if you sign up now for $350, that's a significant savings If you think that's bad, it's good thing you haven't become a big Wrexham fan like myself recently. The subscription to watch their games is about $200 for the season.  Yes that's less money, but that's also for a 4th tier English Football League club (3rd tier next season now), which would be like paying for an XFL package here or something, and unlike Sunday Ticket where you get all games not on local TV, you ONLY get your team's games. So I was only able to watch the Wrexham games with it (granted it's almost 50 games) but none of the rest of the league they were in, which is kinda dumb for the price.
    • doesn't have "elite" or even "above average".  It is very close to what they were saying in the Young draft profiles.  Good not great, average not elite etc..  From Walter Football Weaknesses: Arm strength limitations Smaller hands – nine inches One-year wonder It was the only real knock on Burrow.  Arm was nothing special and they tried to make a deal about his smaller hands lol which was a joke.... I really liked/like Burrow.  I see few stay as calm as he does in the pocket.  He needs to stay healthy this year though or it might become a thing for him...
    • What a terrible policy... basically saying we're going to screw over our most loyal customers, the ones who would never have planned on cancelling their subscription, and make them pay an extra $100 unless they get lucky enough to hear about this offer first. Anyone who signed up last year in time to get the $100 off should just have had the discount automatically added to theirs this year again too.
×
×
  • Create New...