Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Brugler of the Athletic Mock: Panthers trade up to 3 for Fields


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, AU-panther said:

 

So what would you prefer to do? Are you comfortable going with Teddy if a QB doesn’t make it to 8?  Draft a later round QB like Trask or Newman?  Wait till next year? 

I’m not saying you’re wrong, part of me wants to be patient and wait at 8 also, but I can see why they are considering it.

How often do you really get a chance to draft a QB without concerns? If they don’t have concerns they go first and some years even those do. 

I think Wilson could be an injury concern waiting to happen.  I do not like Fields inconsistency.  I worry about Lance playing at less that top level competition and running our style of offense.

Those things give me pause for giving up waaaay too much of things we sorely need on the HOPES that we find the next Mahomes.  Chances are, most will find the next Mariota, or Carr, someone fair, but certainly not worth the draft capital you gave up to get them.

Plus, I am very conservative on drafting QB's.  I was scared to death when we had the number 1 pick and took Cam.  I wanted to trade down.

Lastly, Jones is more of a Brady than a Mahomes physically.  Not saying he can perform at Super Bowl level, just using those 2 as examples.  Both models can get you a Super Bowl, just not sure which type Rhule and Brady want, most Rhule since Brady will be gone in the next couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You see a Patrick Mahomes in this draft class?

I don't.

Skill wise, maybe Wilson but his physical profile reminds me an awful lot of Teddy Bridgewater. I'm not sure he can take the pounding a pro quarterback takes.

No, not saying I do. I just wanted the grand, lol. 

I dont think many saw Mahomes in Mahomes otherwise he would not have went 10th, he would have been pick 1.

I will be happy if we get Lance.

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, stirs said:

I think Wilson could be an injury concern waiting to happen.  I do not like Fields inconsistency.  I worry about Lance playing at less that top level competition and running our style of offense.

Those things give me pause for giving up waaaay too much of things we sorely need on the HOPES that we find the next Mahomes.  Chances are, most will find the next Mariota, or Carr, someone fair, but certainly not worth the draft capital you gave up to get them.

Plus, I am very conservative on drafting QB's.  I was scared to death when we had the number 1 pick and took Cam.  I wanted to trade down.

Lastly, Jones is more of a Brady than a Mahomes physically.  Not saying he can perform at Super Bowl level, just using those 2 as examples.  Both models can get you a Super Bowl, just not sure which type Rhule and Brady want, most Rhule since Brady will be gone in the next couple of years.

What would be your choice of action this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AU-panther said:

What would be your choice of action this year?

We have already tried getting a QB via trade, so we are looking at proven guys.  Watson is all that is left unless the new GM has a line on Russell Wilson, so that leaves the draft.

I do not think all 4 QB's will be gone by the time we pick.  After Jacksonville, you could make the case that every team has their QB already in place.  Of course you can make the case that anybody can take a QB, it is what makes us all go nuts every single time a new MOCK comes out.

It is a tight rope, but I would sit tight and take Fields or Lance at 8.  I think both might be there when we pick.  The wild card will be SF trading in front of us with Detroit to grab someone.

Most likely, if our guys think he can run our system, we will have a choice between the Mahomes type guy in Lance, or the Brady type guy in Jones.  It is up to our coaches and the system they use going forward.

Either way, we surround them with a lot of good players by keeping our picks.  It is about the best you can do in the 8 spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, stirs said:

We have already tried getting a QB via trade, so we are looking at proven guys.  Watson is all that is left unless the new GM has a line on Russell Wilson, so that leaves the draft.

I do not think all 4 QB's will be gone by the time we pick.  After Jacksonville, you could make the case that every team has their QB already in place.  Of course you can make the case that anybody can take a QB, it is what makes us all go nuts every single time a new MOCK comes out.

It is a tight rope, but I would sit tight and take Fields or Lance at 8.  I think both might be there when we pick.  The wild card will be SF trading in front of us with Detroit to grab someone.

Most likely, if our guys think he can run our system, we will have a choice between the Mahomes type guy in Lance, or the Brady type guy in Jones.  It is up to our coaches and the system they use going forward.

Either way, we surround them with a lot of good players by keeping our picks.  It is about the best you can do in the 8 spot

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve said all along my perfect scenario is if we can draft one of the top 4 QBs without trading up.  I’m just not sure if the team is willing to risk it.

I’m not totally sold on Jones, but I could easily be wrong. If we go the Jones route it would be nice if we could pick up an extra pick by trading down, but that could get risky.

 

 

Edited by AU-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Try reading the Huddle. It's pretty much the only topic. 
    • Man.... you all have been ruined by Rhule and Fitt.  Take a moment to look back at areas where we improved and try to grasp on a glimmer of hope and optimism....   Week 1: Sept. 8 at New Orleans  (L) 0-1 I think, all things being equal, we split our divisional opponents.  The Saints are not scary, are not coached well, and are going to get old all at once.  However, being in the Superdome for the first game of the year I lean in to homefield advantage causing us to have a few careless mistakes at the wrong time.  Close game, 27-24 Saints  Week 2: Sept 15 vs. Los Angeles Chargers (W) 1-1 The Chargers have lots of work to do.  This game comes down to one main factor; can we stop the run.  I think our defense, at least at the beginning of the season will be firing on all cylinders.  Close game again, but this time we get the W 24 - 18 Panthers Week 3: Sept 22 at Las Vegas  (W) 2-1 I am a HUGE Gardner Minshew fan, but I don't believe the Raiders are much better than we are.  So long as we don't get beat up by their tight ends all game, I think we should be the better team if we pound the rock.  W - 24-21 Panthers Week 4: Sept. 29 vs. Cincinnati  (L) 2-2 This is going to be a reality check.  We feel good being over .500 for the first time since I can remember.  They are just better.  L - 31-21 Bengals Week 5: Oct. 6 at Chicago (W) 3-2 This is a PRIDE game.  We want it more. W - 24 - 15 Panthers Week 6: Oct. 13 vs. Atlanta (W) 4- 2 This is our turn to get a home W in our division.  Flacons are either going to be pretty good, or a huge bust.  Either way I think they will be susceptible for an upset here and there.  We weren't too far off from beating them last year.   W 27 - 24 Panthers Week 7: Oct. 20 at Washington  (W) 5 - 2  Their defense is good, Offense is a work in progress.... Sound familiar?  This will be bowling shoe ugly but I think we run it better than they do.  W 17 - 12 Panthers Week 8: Oct. 27 at Denver (L) 5-3 If this was at home I would choose us, but I don't see us winning at Mile High.  I will stick with the copy and past analysis on this one.  LSS - we cannot escape our cure of Sean Peyton. L 24 - 18 Broncos Week 9: Nov. 3 vs. New Orleans (W) 6 - 3 Home game, bad team, we win.  W - 27 - 24 Panthers Week 10: Nov. 10 vs. N.Y. Giants (Munich, Germany) (W) 7 - 3 The Giants have an improved pass rush and a rookie WR.  That is their strength.  I think we will be better prepared.  W - Panthers 27 - 21 Week 11: Nov. 17 BYE Week 12: Nov. 24 vs. Kansas City (L) 7 - 4 We'll get crushed, and hit the downward trajectory of our season starting now....  L Chiefs - 34 - 21 Week 13: Dec. 1 vs. Tampa Bay (L) 7 - 5 We are licking our wounds from the KC game and it shows up in the box score.  L - Bucs 24 - 15 Week 14: Dec 8 at Philadelphia (L) 7- 6 I think we give them a game, but come up short in the end.  L - Eagles 32 - 24 Week 15: Dec: 15 vs. Dallas (L) 7 - 7 I want to pick an upset here.  No Dan Quinn, Lots of pressure for Dallas, they have been really healthy for a long time.  But common sense prevails, they are better.  L - Cowboys 24 - 21 Week 16: Dec. 22 vs. Arizona (W) 8 - 7 Get right game, but a tough one.  We need this one to calm the huddle down.  W - Panthers 28 - 24 Week 17: Dec. 29 at Tampa Bay (W) 9 - 7 TB is right where we are.  This is our 50/50 spilt  W - 22 - 25 Week 18: Jan. 4 or 5 at Atlanta (L) 9 - 8 Falcons win the division.  We show improvement from much better coaching and offensive line play.  The Huddle is calms down, but like always is not happy. Full League Prediction: Prepare the poop emojis!!!!!
    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
×
×
  • Create New...