Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

La Canfora on Tepper's desire for Watson/franchise QB


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Reasonable.

That's the thing that most Panthers fans seem to ignore in a lot of these "hypothetical" trade discussions, positional value. 

That's why CMC isn't worth very much as a RB on a massive deal. That's why guys like Moore and Burns ARE worth a lot because they are at premium positions at an entry level price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I think Burns is one of best assets if any team out there that might be interested in Watson.

People need to remember that all 1st aren’t created equal.  

If they wants Burns, my best offer is probably the 2021 and 2022 first and Burns. He's worth that third 1st rounder, the additional player and whatever BS picks you want to throw in. I'd consider putting other picks on the table if they take Teddy, which is probably extremely unreasonable considering their cap situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You can hardly contain yourself with the erotic thoughts of an old moneyed white man "teaching a lesson" to a young talented black man stepping out of line.

Maybe they are dumb enough to cut off their own nose to spite their face but they'll have to tank their organization to do it and Watson will still end up eventually playing elsewhere 

Simply a factual observation on one of the possible outcomes within the set.  Folks seem to be ignoring how "old moneyed white men" just might behave.

Watson's contract obligates him to play for the Texans through the 2025 season...if he plays it out and goes somewhere else in 2026 through free-agency more power to him.

Here's the thing, unless his character/personality have reversed course since paying for Dabo...I believe Deshaun to be a respectful young man.  When it comes time to show up and play he won't act out in the wildly childish and inappropriate way you seem to suggest he is capable of -- but rather he will give it his best as he always has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Definitely.

If you hired me to run your team, and then the first thing you did was start overriding my decisions, I'd likely tell you to kiss my ass and good luck searching for a new GM.

From what I've read about Fitterer, I don't necessarily think he rolls over for something like that either.

I'd probably give the boss 1.  And bring it up, and have a LONG conversation about it.

If he chose to stick with me, he got his 1....never again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Steelers called LeVeon Bell's bluff -- twice!

Au contraire!  It's always best to keep your "franchise QB" within the fold.

The definition of naivete is failing to consider all the possible outcomes...

 

Everyone here is considering all possible outcomes.

Leveon Bell is an RB. A QB is a totally different animal! And, the fact is is that Leveon Bell ultimately got his wish in some form of fashion, and the Steelers looked real sketchy without him (and still do, really). They tried replacing him and have yet to be successful. RBs are relatively easy to be replaced, but not so much a franchise QB who will ultimately end up playing somewhere else if that's what he's committed to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Simply a factual observation on one of the possible outcomes within the set.  Folks seem to be ignoring how "old moneyed white men" just might behave.

Watson's contract obligates him to play for the Texans through the 2025 season...if he plays it out and goes somewhere else in 2026 through free-agency more power to him.

Here's the thing, unless his character/personality have reversed course since paying for Dabo...I believe Deshaun to be a respectful young man.  When it comes time to show up and play he won't act out in the wildly childish and inappropriate way you seem to suggest he is capable of -- but rather he will give it his best as he always has.

Houston would also have a 36 million dollar cap hit annually for someone to not play for them.

They will likely already lose 40% or more of their STHs this year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Everyone here is considering all possible outcomes.

Leveon Bell is an RB. A QB is a totally different animal! And, the fact is is that Leveon Bell ultimately got his wish in some form of fashion, and the Steelers looked real sketchy without him (and still do, really). They tried replacing him and have yet to be successful. RBs are relatively easy to be replaced, but not so much a franchise QB who will ultimately end up playing somewhere else if that's what he's committed to doing.

yep, RBs are largely replaceable.  CMC is the best RB in the NFL.....and random Mike Davis did a pretty good impersonation of him early on.   

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Simply a factual observation on one of the possible outcomes within the set.  Folks seem to be ignoring how "old moneyed white men" just might behave.

Watson's contract obligates him to play for the Texans through the 2025 season...if he plays it out and goes somewhere else in 2026 through free-agency more power to him.

Here's the thing, unless his character/personality have reversed course since paying for Dabo...I believe Deshaun to be a respectful young man.  When it comes time to show up and play he won't act out in the wildly childish and inappropriate way you seem to suggest he is capable of -- but rather he will give it his best as he always has.

You have already lashed out at Watson on numerous occasions and called him a "whiny bitch." Then you went on to laud JJ Watt.

Strange how you were silent when he engineered his way out of his "contractual obligation."

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

yep, RBs are largely replaceable.  CMC is the best RB in the NFL.....and random Mike Davis did a pretty good impersonation of him early on.   

By season's end, we were runningback by committee.

Regardless of what you think of McCaffrey, the notion that he was replaceable by Mike Davis is beyond silly. Davis isn't anything even remotely close to the weapon that McCaffrey is.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

yep, RBs are largely replaceable.  CMC is the best RB in the NFL.....and random Mike Davis did a pretty good impersonation of him early on.   

 

Hence why you don't make a RB one of the highest paid in the NFL. See Hurney 1.0, 2.0 and I am sure eventually 3.0 for the WTF's. 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

No disrespect to Gross-Matos, but if you're coming from the perspective of trading away a player like Deshaun Watson (while needing to replace a franchise legend like JJ Watt) and I offer you a rookie rather than a guy like Brian Burns in return, are you taking my offer seriously?

Why stop there though? If you're Houston and trading away Watson and I'm offering 3 1sts, 3 2nds, Burns, CMC, and Donte Jackson but not including DJ Moore, Chinn and the next 3 3rd round picks too, are you taking my offer seriously? I mean you're not offering every single valuable asset you have? What kind of fool do you make me out to be?!  How dare the Texans even consider an offer including 3 1sts and a promising young pass rusher in Gross-Matos. Get out of here with that weak crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was one of the first to suggest Watson before he got his big extension.   So my desire for Watson is documented.  

While I realize out new front office promises to be more aggressive,  it may end up being to aggressive. Getting rid of Burns would be an example of to aggressive.  We've been tying to rebuild the pass rush for a long time, and we're finally getting there, but haven't arrived. Getting rid of burns, will set us back on pass rush, which isn't easy to replace.  

Ultimately, the Texans hold all the cards. I'd be shocked if Watson is wearing another uniform this next season.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...