Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fix The Damn Line


TriggaPlease89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

If you make zero changes but swap Watson for Teddy with last year's roster, that's worth likely 3-4 more wins alone. Again, I agree that the OL needs improvement but if a desired QB is available the team has to get him and improve the OL in parallel as they can.

If the goal is only to make the playoffs then yes 3-4 more wins is cool but if we want to be a consistent winner then a longer view is necessary.  Sorry I'm on board on a rookie salary QB that booms rather than a proven guy that cost a arm and leg.  Let Houston drown.  We can keep swimming.  We are not treading water, promise we are on our way.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The oline played great the first half of games. Then checked out at half time. Where is the stats for that? That poo is awful.

Add in Moton played at a high level and Okung did too when he was in.

And they still ranked #18 in the NFL.

It’s a bigger problem than people think. TB sucks yea but it’s just fuging lazy to say the oline isn’t that big of a problem.

It’s actually worse than people think.

 

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

If the goal is only to make the playoffs then yes 3-4 more wins is cool but if we want to be a consistent winner then a longer view is necessary.  Sorry I'm on board on a rookie salary QB that booms rather than a proven guy that cost a arm and leg.  Let Houston drown.  We can keep swimming.  We are not treading water, promise we are on our way.

IMO this is where faith in the regime comes in. I would certainly like the rookie contract as well but those guys are all unknowns. Watson is a proven top-level QB.

And agreed also that winning it all is the priority. I'm trusting the staff and FO to have and execute a big-picture plan, be it a vet QB at cost or a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes, when everything else goes perfectly, Teddy can effectively complete short passes and sometimes our very good YAC receivers can do something with them.

Lol yeah it didn’t work for him on 4th and 7 when he threw it for 2 yards. That play right there just pissed me off, I was done with his ass after that. Anybody trying to take up for ass don’t watch a damn thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

That said putting watson behind a average rag tag group of lineman will not bring the results some expect.  Watson likes a clean pocket ( all qbs prefer it ) but his rushing disguises the fact he holds onto the ball awhile.  He has taken sacks a lot because of his rushing and holding the ball.  That's not gonna change.  I'm gonna get some poo but if CMC is healthy and we improve the oline I do think teddy could be better.

Frustrated Buzz Lightyear GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, onmyown said:

The oline played great the first half of games. Then checked out at half time. Where is the stats for that? That poo is awful.

Add in Moton played at a high level and Okung did too when he was in.

And they still ranked #18 in the NFL.

It’s a bigger problem than people think. TB sucks yea but it’s just fuging lazy to say the oline isn’t that big of a problem.

It’s actually worse than people think.

 

you have no clue lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Lol yeah it didn’t work for him on 4th and 7 when he threw it for 2 yards. That play right there just pissed me off, I was done with his ass after that. Anybody trying to take up for ass don’t watch a damn thing.

Yeah, that was awful. But I think the moment the staff quit on him was when he threw them under the bus for getting the play call in late so that he couldn't check to a run on the play where he missed DJ Moore wide open in the endzone nearly resulting in DJ getting injured. I honestly think that was the moment when Teddy officially had no future beyond the '20/'21 season in Carolina.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KillerKat said:

The line gave us plenty of opportunities last year to make plays that we didn't simply because Teddy is god awful. It is not nearly as bad as most people think it is.

Truth. All the graphic in the OP shows is that Teddy can ONLY function under perfect conditions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see my point didn’t get across to the narrow minded, so let me reiterate. I used this graphic to illustrate that even the most mediocre of QB can look proficient with a clean pocket. This franchise hasn’t seen true effort to build a stable efficient OL. Now is the time. Luck is the best recent example outside of Cam for a generational talent being wasted because of blatant negligence. If we want to believe this regime is any less oblivious than the last will be the next step towards sustained success and that is investing HEAVILY into the OL. They went all out in defense since it was the weakest link in the team. This year we have 1 I repeat 1 starter from last years line on contract. This year we should see significant draft capital used on the line. A decent amount of free agents brought in and Moton hopefully resigned or tagged. This is the next step necessary to build a perennial winner. A QB at this point is a luxury with all the needs we have. If we get “our guy” great if not do what’s proven to set up future success. That is all. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TriggaPlease89 said:

My point was no matter who the QB is you need OL help to give them the best chance to succeed. 

No pocket is always clean, and most QBs will have decent stat line when cherry picking plays when they had a clean pocket. Of course having the best oline possible is ideal and helps out QBs, no one would ever argue otherwise. But we could have the ‘93 Cowboys’ oline and with Teddy back there we aren’t going anywhere. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mickeye76 said:

That said putting watson behind a average rag tag group of lineman will not bring the results some expect.  Watson likes a clean pocket ( all qbs prefer it ) but his rushing disguises the fact he holds onto the ball awhile.  He has taken sacks a lot because of his rushing and holding the ball.  That's not gonna change.  I'm gonna get some poo but if CMC is healthy and we improve the oline I do think teddy could be better.

I’ve seen Watson hold the ball too long (usually when he has no one open). He is 25 and still is developing and is currently one of the top QBs in the league as is.  Imagine how good he can be in a couple more years. The great QBs (Brady, Rodgers, and Brees) also hold the ball, but usually have top lines to protect them which I think is part of your point. I’m hoping you are saying Teddy can be “better” as in better than he was last year and not better than Watson. Watson behind an average line is 1000x better than Teddy behind an All Pro Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
    • Look at what the Bears have done with Caleb Williams, drafting playmaking WR's and TE's and making it easier for him to operate the offense. Conception is perfect for what the offense needs (speed and someone who can make defenders miss) and as today, April 11th, I think he's the pick @19 
×
×
  • Create New...