Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/02/20/whether-its-deshaun-watson-or-someone-else-david-tepper-is-determined-to-get-a-great-quarterback/

Newbie

By Newbie,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Newbie Experienced

Newbie

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, Captain Obvious said:

Appreciate the effort but the execution of starting a new thread really sucks,

Yeah it was my first time. I’m hoping my second effort will be better and if I blow three in a row I promise not to ever come back. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

I’m a member on a larger sport team forum as well and they have a lobby to introduce yourself first and then admin/mod will determine to let you join or not.  Once you allowed to join, you can reply to threads all over the forum but you cannot start a thread until you reach certain level of posting.

Sounds like Communism to me. Free the speech!

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, philit99 said:

Zod, if your watching or listening, please bring back the 100 post minimum. I know some posters are excited to join a community but the redundant amount of info is becoming miserable. The huddle should be a source of topics and good inside information, not conjecture and posts after posts of the same material.

He will just say if you don’t like it don’t click on it, sorry but that’s the new huddle I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, stirs said:

Internet message boards.

Where 300 different threads about the same subject are okay, the the 301st is terrible because some NEW guy did it.

Boy, of all the nerve, huh

 

289 of those 300 are from Huddlers with less than 100 rep. That used to be the starting point. Main forum is flooded with repetitive topics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, philit99 said:

289 of those 300 are from Huddlers with less than 100 rep. That used to be the starting point. Main forum is flooded with repetitive topics. 

And a lot of from well known Huddlers who just want another way of talking about Watson.  Why, who knows.

Somebody new comes along and what do you expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...