Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simms Just Released his 2021 QB Rankings


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Kellen Mond? Yeah, he's gonna have to ex-spleen that one.

I was looking for a spleen pun but couldn't come up with a good one.

1 minute ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Let's just say the list is "interesting" and leave it at that.

Old Chinese saying: "May you live in interesting times."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Peter King...

Don't know if he's right here...

We won't know for years.

But still...

Honestly he's the dude who's QB rankings I have been waiting on with baited breath. Pobody's nerfect but this dude seems to be able to evaluate QBs and how well they will transition to the NFL more accurately than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

On a number of fronts (and just limiting it to the Panthers), we certainly do.

The common discussion with that saying is whether it's meant to be a blessing or a curse.

I'd say it's a valid question.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, the huddle is by and large, idiots, and I have no problem saying I’m an idiot too. With that being said, dude has SOLID reasoning for why he made his decisions and I’m seeing the same things he is seeing. This is a special QB class make no mistake about it. 
 

as far as Mond is concerned, he looked great in his multiple TD drives once he calmed down in the Senior Bowl, he definitely needs time on the bench tho, but I think he has a great shot at a pro career if he can get the mental aspect down and reproduce those winning drives on a consistent basis, because it was all him giving Rhules team a chance in the senior bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

First of all, the huddle is by and large, idiots, and I have no problem saying I’m an idiot too. With that being said, dude has SOLID reasoning for why he made his decisions and I’m seeing the same things he is seeing. This is a special QB class make no mistake about it. 
 

as far as Mond is concerned, he looked great in his multiple TD drives once he calmed down in the Senior Bowl, he definitely needs time on the bench tho, but I think he has a great shot at a pro career if he can get the mental aspect down and reproduce those winning drives on a consistent basis, because it was all him giving Rhules team a chance in the senior bowl. 

If I'm gonna take a shot at an inconsistent QB, I'd take a shot at a far more talented prospect who has played at a much higher level in Fields.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

First of all, the huddle is by and large, idiots, and I have no problem saying I’m an idiot too. With that being said, dude has SOLID reasoning for why he made his decisions and I’m seeing the same things he is seeing. This is a special QB class make no mistake about it. 
 

as far as Mond is concerned, he looked great in his multiple TD drives once he calmed down in the Senior Bowl, he definitely needs time on the bench tho, but I think he has a great shot at a pro career if he can get the mental aspect down and reproduce those winning drives on a consistent basis, because it was all him giving Rhules team a chance in the senior bowl. 

Nice post.  it is fun to make points, but when a Huddler makes a bold statement like "You are wrong and I am so very right." about a future that includes a transition from college to the NFL-- I laugh because it is a blatant bluff--bravado--chest pounding. 

What you say about Mond is spot on---he needs time, but the skill set is there.  I am not sure that his skill set exceeds Fields or Lance, but my inability to see it does not make it wrong.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...