Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This might explain a lot


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

Was there ever a man more interested in the bottom line?

53120292401014430421003476992_19ff7746ec

Honestly I never saw him with the scowl on his face until around the time he was privately paying out the hush money due to the "jean day" fiasco. He was probably pissed he had to pay out and even though we didnt know it till later, he was wearing his feelings on his shoulders in these pics.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

tbh thank god for the rookie pay scale

 

that was getting out of hand very quickly

Agreed. Paying a rookie that had never taken a snap more than an all pro was ridiculous. There needed to be a rookie cap. Early picks had to work out because if they didn't, the salary cap damage just made the pick even worse. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 54th man said:

Honestly I never saw him with the scowl on his face until around the time he was privately paying out the hush money due to the "jean day" fiasco. He was probably pissed he had to pay out and even though we didnt know it till later, he was wearing his feelings on his shoulders in these pics.

Mentioned elsewhere, but I remember when that scandal broke and he announced that it would be handled by "internal investigation".

I think he genuinely believed the "good old boy" network of the NFL would cover for him.

Yeah...Not in this day and age.

His face when he found out they wouldn't probably looked a lot like those pictures.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

All things considered, shocking we've had the amount of "success" we did in 20 years when we were so obviously hamstrung in a lot of ways by the owner/GM/coaching choices. 

Definitely.

Of course, having an owner who judged the quality of the draft primarily by the first round probably made it easier to be a mediocre GM.

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mentioned elsewhere, but I remember when that scandal broke and he announced that it would be handled by "internal investigation".

I think he genuinely believed the "good old boy" network of the NFL would cover for him.

Yeah...Not in this day and age.

His face when he found out they wouldn't probably looked a lot like those pictures.

Even though he was wrong I am forever grateful to the man for bringing the nfl to the Carolinas. Sweet logo sweet colors sweet foundation. Oh well

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

Was there ever a man more interested in the bottom line?

53120292401014430421003476992_19ff7746ec

Exactly. JR cared about revenue first and foremost...of course the draft was all about who got paid most lol.

It’s really was a shame is he was the owner for 20 years.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 54th man said:

Even though he was wrong I am forever grateful to the man for bringing the nfl to the Carolinas. Sweet logo sweet colors sweet foundation. Oh well

One man cannot possibly do that. PSL owners, demand, and tax payers made the Carolina Panthers a reality.

If it wasn’t JR it would’ve been another person. Because the former 3 things (a local market and one willing to pay for a team) were there. 

JR was just the guy who was able to own it. Lucky for him. Unfortunate for the Carolinas.

Edited by onmyown
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

tbh thank god for the rookie pay scale

 

that was getting out of hand very quickly

I agree but it sucks that the franchise tag is still a thing.  A player could get hit with the 5th-year option and a franchise tag (potentially 2-3x but unlikely) before being able to negotiate a contract or hit the open market.

I get why the current players wouldn't care about guys not in the league yet, but wish they could have negotiated something better.  I think making it where it is a 3-year deal and the 4th year is the option year works out for both the player and the team.  And make it where you can only be tagged once.  That still lets a team hold onto a player for at least 5 years if they can't negotiate a contract, but eliminates the possibility of getting tagged more than once and guarantees you hit the open market (if you so choose) after 5 years in the NFL as opposed to potentially 6 or more.   

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...