Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Adam Schefter, “In speaking to some teams, I don’t think this is going to deter anyone’s interest in trading for Deshaun Watson”


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No one is bad-mouthing Watson. What we're saying is stop bad mouthing the women just because you love the person who is accused.  As far is I can tell those not jumping in head first in the defend Watson no matter what pool are being labeled just like the women in this case.  Ironic isn't it.

See how ur trying to stir sh$t up never said I didn’t believe the women. Y’all want to run Watson under the bus and have no idea what’s going on. There are 100 pages of u put these threads together of nobody knowing anything and act like they do. So don’t respond to me saying I said something when I didn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Anyone who has drawn a conclusion already one way or the other, from the very little information or substance provided, needs to chill the hell out and wait. 

We don't know what is true yet. If it turns out he's a scumbag rapist, a lot of you people are going to look like real mysognistic, incel dicks. 

If he is innocent, a lot of you are going to look like a rabid pitch, fork wielding, blood thirsty mob working themselves up into a frenzy to take down the celebrity.

The facts right now are that he's been accused by multiple women of some really shady things, and he denies it. 

That's it. Those are literally all the facts that we know right now. Literally everything else is speculation. 

Pretty much.

2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

He was never neighbors with Cal McNair, he was neighbors with Bob McNair.

Big distinction for this whole drama. 

I saw one place that said he claimed to be neighbors with Bob McNair but I don't know that it was actually verified.

He's also said that he's never been much of a Texans fan, which is kind of funny given that he bought billboards encouraging the Texans to draft Johnny Manziel. I suppose you could attribute that to him being a Manziel fan but still...

Bottom Line: Yhis is a really sad and extremely complicated situation that's probably going to take a long time to resolve one way or the other.

Until it does though, I think you'd have to say the wisest course for the Panthers is to steer clear of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Also, I've repeatedly stated WHY I don't believe these accusations (the owner and his neighbor being the lawyer) and haven't said a word about not believing women or them being liars or anything so please miss me with that strawman in particular

How exactly would it be possible for the accusations to be false but the women making them not be liars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

See how ur trying to stir sh$t up never said I didn’t believe the women. Y’all want to run Watson under the bus and have no idea what’s going on. There are 100 pages of u put these threads together of nobody knowing anything and act like they do. So don’t respond to me saying I said something when I didn’t.

You seem awful angry and defensive.  Struck a nerve did I?  Chill brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

How exactly would it be possible for the accusations to be false but the women making them not be liars?

I can think this is bullshit and not think all women are liars, please don't key in on one word or two to try and pick apart my argument, it's pedantic esp when it doesn't affect my point at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I can think this is bullshit and not think all women are liars, please don't key in on one word or two to try and pick apart my argument, it's pedantic esp when it doesn't affect my point at all

For these specific accusations to be false, then all of the women making them would have to be liars.

There's really no way around that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:


this lawyer is dumb as hell

Guess he missed the whole ‘confidential’ in bold letters at the top lol.

Although as someone who routines works with confidential information just putting it at the top has no bases, as is there is nothing about this letter, information or otherwise that would make it ‘confidential’. ‘The League’ are no law enforcement, a government entity, judges, or healthcare.

I am assuming that stamp is for internal employees/policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...