Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Adam Schefter, “In speaking to some teams, I don’t think this is going to deter anyone’s interest in trading for Deshaun Watson”


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Does anyone have an example of someone paying a woman to fabricate an allegation against someone for Gods knows what reason?  Maybe it has happened but the google is doing anything for me

Legally, that would be illegal if they filed a complaint with the police for a criminal matter. In a civil case, the need for evidence is not a requirement for a decision. 
What seems likely to me(speculating) the women, or the initial woman made a complaint to the team and it was swept aside because of a lack of evidence. When Deshaun stood firm with his desire to leave the Texans, then that complaint was passed to a lawyer(unethical) who took the matter as a personal vendetta to alter the desire of other teams to acquire the player through means of a trade. It also will have an impact on his bank account, regardless of the impact how minimal it may be.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Does anyone have an example of someone paying a woman to fabricate an allegation against someone for Gods knows what reason?  Maybe it has happened but the google is doing anything for me

It might be because ur not that smart. I don’t need google for anything. Sorry if I hurt ur feelings JS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

And if all they got are those texts then alleging Watson is guilty is wrong. Thanks for proving my point

Da faq you talking about?  I am saying let it play out and see, however I seriously doubt, as you allege, that someone is paying 9 women to do this.  All I am asking is for one example which you cannot provide.  So yeah.......

 

If this stuff happens all the time as you guys are saying then surely there has to be an example of it happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So......no example of what you are alleging.   Got it

omg...there's hundreds if not thousands of cases where plaintiffs in sexual harassment/ misconduct cases have been counter sued for defamation of character.

the lady who began began the "# me too" movement in France by the name of Sandra Muller lost a civil suit filed by her accused perpetrator & was ordered to pay monetary damages for defamation of character  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnny depps former wife.

almost ruined his career until everything unraveled and it was shown she made all the abuse charges up. It does happen. But that does not mean these allegations should not be taken seriously. This dumb ass lawyer is muddying the waters even further with his bullshit tho.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bandu said:

omg...there's hundreds if not thousands of cases where plaintiffs in sexual harassment/ misconduct cases have been counter sued for defamation of character.

the lady who began began the "# me too" movement in France by the name of Sandra Muller lost a civil suit filed by her accused perpetrator & was ordered to pay monetary damages for defamation of character  

I am not saying that.  What you are saying is different.  I am saying how often does a 3rd party pay a woman to make up fictitious allegations.  It may happen but it certainly is not commonplace. 

 

But all in all this is not going to be resolved in a month I doubt so I still think watson is not coming here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am not saying that.  What you are saying is different.  I am saying how often does a 3rd party pay a woman to make up fictitious allegations.  It may happen but it certainly is not commonplace. 

 

But all in all this is not going to be resolved in a month I doubt so I still think watson is not coming here

If The Panthers were able to afford the risk, then they could do it with a significant reduction in the total proposal to the Texans. It is a high risk and high reward depending on the outcome of the case(s). The question is how much risk are they willing to accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...