Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would if found innocent.

I am still waiting on the evidence of criminal activity before I pass judgement. Otherwise it is what it is, which is a person that likes massages that would end in something that he was hoping for. Perhaps the young man thought that it was consenting behavior between two adults. 
Does this reduce the likelihood that the Panthers acquire him? Perhaps, or perhaps not, but I strongly doubt that he is done in the NFL. Someone is going to take a flyer on him.

I would like to remind everyone that we have only heard ONE side of the story.

Be thankful that justice does not occur in the court of public opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

I would if found innocent.

I am still waiting on the evidence of criminal activity before I pass judgement. Otherwise it is what it is, which is a person that likes massages that would end in something that he was hoping for. Perhaps the young man thought that it was consenting behavior between two adults. 
Does this reduce the likelihood that the Panthers acquire him? Perhaps, or perhaps not, but I strongly doubt that he is done in the NFL. Someone is going to take a flyer on him.

I would like to remind everyone that we have only heard ONE side of the story.

Be thankful that justice does not occur in the court of public opinion.

How do you find him innocent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

In this case, the allegations are coming from twenty-two sources.

Verge's source described the Watson situation as "nuclear", i.e. nobody's likely to touch it with a proverbial ten foot pole.

"sources" lol. you say that as these sources actually know what happened. the only "sources" are Watson and the women. not bogus journalist that just write what everyone else is saying. that is not a source. they do not know anything more than anyone else does. they are just reporting what they hear. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ericr0319 said:

"sources" lol. you say that as these sources actually know what happened. the only "sources" are Watson and the women. not bogus journalist that just write what everyone else is saying. that is not a source. they do not know anything more than anyone else does. they are just reporting what they hear. 

Hes talking in terms of teams actions now via Verge sources. Not what happened between Watson and the Women...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...