Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pitts runs 4.46 40


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Helluva prospect. Zero desire to draft him due to desperate needs at positions of much higher positional value.

Eh, I'm still on board Pitts as a fall back plan, even after signing Arnold. he is somewhere between Greg Olsen and Vernon Davis as a prospect. To me it's a Derwin James type situation: you know the guy is walking in to the NFL as a top 5 guy at his position, just not as important as the rest of the regulars (kickers excluded). That said James in my mind was undervalued even at safety, sucks the guy has had issues staying on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chbright said:

Eh, I'm still on board Pitts as a fall back plan, even after signing Arnold. he is somewhere between Greg Olsen and Vernon Davis as a prospect. To me it's a Derwin James type situation: you know the guy is walking in to the NFL as a top 5 guy at his position, just not as important as the rest of the regulars (kickers excluded). That said James in my mind was undervalued even at safety, sucks the guy has had issues staying on the field.

I wanted James sooooo bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Helluva prospect. Zero desire to draft him due to desperate needs at positions of much higher positional value.

If Pitts is worst out-come for the 8th pick, Im perfectly fine with that 10/10. Imagine trying to stop Pitts, CMC, Anderson, Moore and _______ . Teddy or not, having a legit threat at each inch of the field, I could go along with that so long all QBs and LTs are long gone. O and Chase is gone as well, the NFL has vastly under rated TE anyways. 

Now all these numbers coming out of these pro-day are sus, very sus. Even if you add 10% to that 4.46 its still very impressive. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

If Pitts is worst out-come for the 8th pick, Im perfectly fine with that 10/10. Imagine trying to stop Pitts, CMC, Anderson, Moore and _______ . Teddy or not, having a legit threat at each inch of the field, I could go along with that so long all QBs and LTs are long gone. O and Chase is gone as well, the NFL has vastly under rated TE anyways. 

Now all these numbers coming out of these pro-day are sus, very sus. Even if you add 10% to that 4.46 its still very impressive. 

Challenge accepted. My entire D is gonna be within 10 yards of the LOS every snap

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitts going top 15 will be a mistake.  He is a uber athletic big WR/TE.  He has rare talent but it's not like we have not seen this before.  Recently Mike Gesicki out of Penn St. ran a 4.55 official at the combine.  Leaped out of the building and put up 20+ reps on the bench.  He was taken in the second round.  Pitts had more college production but comparing raw upside they similar.  Bottom of the first into top of the second is Pitts actual value.  Pro day numbers are notorious for being inflated.  In all honesty I would take a chance on baby gronk out of yep Penn st at a discount over Pitts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...