Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sounds like Jets' 2nd pick is open for business...?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

overbidding for a proven NFL commodity is one thing....over bidding for a dude whose signature game was losing to Coastal Carolina doesn't do it for me. 

I didn't say I was in favor of overbidding, just that if a team wants Wilson they'll likely have to offer the Jets more than what is typical to move up to #2.

Bottom line:  In a QB driven league, where multiple teams are looking for an upgrade, Wilson will likely have multiple suitors.  Jets hold all the cards/seller's market.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

You just sound scared of drafting college QBs in general

I wanted to draft Cam at #1 and was one of the first lobbying for it. 

I think we should draft a QB at 8.  One of the top 4 if there.  I don’t love Lance there but I won’t  cry over it.    We aren’t talking that. 

They are all lotto picks.  I’m not a fan of giving up a bunch of great picks for one.  Bust rate is way too high. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I wanted to draft Cam at #1 and was one of the first lobbying for it. 

I think we should draft a QB at 8.  One of the top 4 of there.  I don’t love Lance there but I want cry over it.    We aren’t talking that. 

They are all lotto picks.  I’m not a fan of giving up a bunch of great picks for one.  Bust rate is way too high. 

I think it'd just take next year's first and like a fifth to move up to 3, tbh. I'm willing to do that for Justin Fields

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not on the Wilson train but acting like that coastal Carolina game shows anything is both silly and lazy analysis.

Wilson played pretty well that game but a lot of his teammates didn't. His receivers were dropping balls left and right.

CC was just about the best competition he played. He also had arguably the best olineman and oline program out of any competition he has played, and in college football in general.

His weapons though yea not the best.

I believe a lot of his mobility was allowed by a superior oline.

Around here (about 20 mins from BYU campus), it’s takes a lot of effort to find any BYU fan that thinks he’ll be a franchise QB. Even ones who love him/BYU. Of course, it’s a fans perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not on the Wilson train but acting like that coastal Carolina game shows anything is both silly and lazy analysis.

Wilson played pretty well that game but a lot of his teammates didn't. His receivers were dropping balls left and right.

They lost that game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest issue with people who say stay at 8 and draft one next year is that there is a high chance we will not be picking this high again next year, especially if you couple in the extra game next season as well. Plus unless there is a sudden QB that has an explosive year next year, the class looks to be a weaker one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...