Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your "so far" take on Fitterer


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I concur.

That said, do either Rhule or Fitterer report to the other?

In the traditional NFL model the chain of command is Owner > GM > Coach...

...do you believe it's something different with the Panthers?

Lmao I haven't been here long but bro... how do you get negative reputation that's crazy, didn't even know that was possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I concur.

That said, do either Rhule or Fitterer report to the other?

In the traditional NFL model the chain of command is Owner > GM > Coach...

...do you believe it's something different with the Panthers?

Expand  

@LinvilleGorge, if he spams the Appaloosa stuff one more time, I'd say you have just cause.

We have yet to establish who Fitterer reports to...

...seems like it would be important to know.

Do you know?

Seems like there are 3 options:

1.  Tepper >> Fitterer >> Rhule

2.  Tepper >> Rhule >> Fitterer

3.  Rhule <> Tepper <> Fitterer

Which do you believe to be the case?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Lmao I haven't been here long but bro... how do you get negative reputation that's crazy, didn't even know that was possible

Balance and accountability are very unpopular concepts with many folks --- I believe strongly in both.

[not to mention there are 2 or 3 guys who follow me around and ding every post I make -- it's easy to figure out who they are]

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

We have yet to establish who Fitterer reports to...

...seems like it would be important to know.

Do you know?

Seems like there are 3 options:

1.  Tepper >> Fitterer >> Rhule

2.  Tepper >> Rhule >> Fitterer

3.  Rhule <> Tepper <> Fitterer

Which do you believe to be the case?

As of right now I would say Tepper > Rhule > Fitterer

I believe Rhule is making decisions, Tepper is making the call (yes/no call), and Fitterer is using his connections. 

My opinion obviously i dont know for sure

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarolinaLivin said:

As of right now I would say Tepper > Rhule > Fitterer

I believe Rhule is making decisions, Tepper is making the call (yes/no call), and Fitterer is using his connections. 

My opinion obviously i dont know for sure

Seems logical.

Would be akin to Belichick with Patriots where he's the GM & HC...and the recently departed Nick Caserio who was Director of Player Personnel.

While non-traditional, it sure worked well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO I'm not sure the way you'd say the progression of the layout of who reports to who. I think it would probably look like this, but I may not be saying just right.

Tepper <> Fitterer <> Rhule

or

Tepper > Fitterer > Rhule

It is all discussed with Tepper since he's the owner of the team! Fitterer is using his connections, and Rhule makes the call (yes/no)

From what I've seen in other places. Fitt is the GM, Rhule has final say when it comes to the roster, and then I believe it's a combination of (Fitterer/Suleiman) that irons out the contrats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

IMO I'm not sure the way you'd say the progression of the layout of who reports to who. I think it would probably look like this, but I may not be saying just right.

Tepper <> Fitterer <> Rhule

or

Tepper > Fitterer > Rhule

It is all discussed with Tepper since he's the owner of the team! Fitterer is using his connections, and Rhule makes the call (yes/no)

From what I've seen in other places. Fitt is the GM, Rhule has final say when it comes to the roster, and then I believe it's a combination of (Fitterer/Suleiman) that irons out the contrats

Both those scenarios seem to presume Fitterer is Rhule's boss.

Fitterer would be a direct report to Tepper...and Rhule would be a direct report to Fitterer.  [Tepper > Fitterer > Rhule]

This what you're thinking?

It would be nice to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Lmao I haven't been here long but bro... how do you get negative reputation that's crazy, didn't even know that was possible

That is the most valuable rep on this web-site, Each one of those triggered poops is worth X1000 normal pie. I hate giving Sizzlebuzz any positive rep for that reason. Most login to alts to poop him too, compete cowards. Huddle is VERY serious to some, dont even get me started on the litterbox crew.... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...