Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers trading up to number 3 with Miami!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jared Patterson said:

I hope. 

Yeah I honestly like him quite a bit better than Wilson and Lance, from what I've seen from this QBs (which is admittedly not a lot and I'm just some nobody fan) I'd put Lawrence in a tier of his own, Fields 1 tier below TL, and then Wilson and Lance in a 3rd tier. All are amazing prospects and well worth a top 5-10 pick in any draft, but I definitely like Fields the most of the 3 potential guys. If we can get him without giving up anything extra, or at least giving up significantly less than the 49ers gave up to get another QB, I'd be ecstatic. Unlikely though.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CKI said:

This kinda sounds like the worst outcome.  We know Teddy isnt the future long term, so this just hurts draft picks and potential to draft a QB next year.  I'd rather just play someone new just to see if there's any potential (darnold/minshew)

Why it needs to be an LT this year if not a QB. That way we at least lower the bar for the calibur of QB we need to have back there. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Weird flex after your awkward attempt at equating the desire to acquire a better quarterback with automatically defending sexual assault but okie dokie.

Did you really just equate dudes whining on a message board to victims of sexual assault? 👀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

Well, if this does in fact mean we will not draft a QB at 8, at least we should be able to solve our hole at LT which has been a problem for the longest time and would be the 2nd most important move we could make. When life gives you lemons you make lemonade. KEEP POUNDING!!!!

I think getting an elite LT in the first, and then let's look at a guy like Kellan Mond in the 2nd 😃

Our LT position has been pretty bad with a few outliers since Jordan Gross retired. =(  

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...