Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers split personnel to watch Justin Fields and Mac Jones' pro days

Panthers316

By Panthers316,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

 

if the 49ers really want Jones over this kid, beyond stupid 

Odd question - Would there be a scenario where Lynch would move up to 3, just to trade back and accumulate more assets?

If they wanted Mac Jones, they could've come up to 8 to get him if they thought we were interested. However, no SF holds the cards at 3 and could trade back with us, perhaps gain an extra asset vs. what they gave up to MIA and still take Jones at 8.

The SF front office is not a room full of folks that untrained GMs need to enter. Pace got worked in that Trubisky deal and I feel like they have something up their sleeve here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

"Mental processing is slow"

Hmmmm

Yes, teams and scouts are INTENTIONALLY hamstringing themselves. 🙄

They've watched the tape - there aren't any questions about his arm strength or mobility (albeit there's questions about his mechanics). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-TEM-X Apprentice

X-TEM-X

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

We’re getting Fields or Lance. Trust Rhule. Those are the two pro days he went to. 

Yeah but Joe brady went to Mac Jones pro day so We have to wait and see what their results on these guys I hope we can get Lance or Field on 8th pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-TEM-X Apprentice

X-TEM-X

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Varking said:

Was his pro day today?

Ran a 4.57 and I can only find one highlight throw from an awful angle. 

I don't think so He won't escape from Pocket passes against Average or Top 10 NFL defense if We get him on mid-3rd or 4th rounder pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • rayzor
      Peyton Wilson and Will Shipley

      By rayzor · Posted

      me likey.
    • CRA
      Peyton Wilson and Will Shipley

      By CRA · Posted

      I could see Ruke or Xavier being possibilities this year.  Top 30 visits.  Seems this group looked at Clemson more so than past regimes.   Not that I really want that to happen.  I think the last time I legitimately wanted them to draft a Tiger was Nuk.  I'm also curious if they end up doubling down on the local products.   XL checks the box.   They brought Wilson, Walker, a bunch of Clemson guys in.  Who knows.  I would like Shipley in the 4th. 
    • SCO96
      WR Corp drastically improved or not?

      By SCO96 · Posted

      DJ Clark and Jonathan Mingo were our #2 and #3 receivers behind Theilan. The two of them combined for 78 catches ,5 TDS , and 943 yards . Those are the type of number you should expect for a lone #2 receiver or a stud TE over the course of a 17 game season. To match that production level in 2024 XL would need to average 4.5 receptions per game, a TD every 3 games, and 55.5 yards per game. If XL is used properly and if Bryce is competent enough to get him the ball he should have no trouble reaching (or surpassing) those totals which would be a huge improvement for our passing game.  Theilan is still a dependable #3 and the addition of Johnson gives us a true # 1. On paper we are without a doubt better at WR. Whether or not it translates to the field remains to be seen.  
×
×
  • Create New...