Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How realistic a chance at Sewell?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's what everybody expected, but there's lots of talk now it could go another way.

(no way I'd bypass Sewell if I were them, but I'm not them)

I mean if Sewell is still on the board when we pick. You take him. But I agree he may not even get out of the top 4 at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

If Sewell is on the board you pick him. If he’s not you pick your Fields or Lance depending if either are there. If they are all gone and you can’t trade back grab Pitts. 

Just to make sure I'm understanding you here, you would take Sewell over Fields and Lance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Klein expands on his prior tweet...

Anyone else have Slater or Surtain over Sewell right now?

Not me, but Slater is getting a lot of whisper.  I see Pitts, Sewell, Chase, and maybe some dark horse pass rusher or CB possibly making the top 8.  If SF takes Jones, that plays well into our hands, but the phones will be ringing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im feel pretty blue about our prospects.. That Miami trade screwed us in a few ways. 

We know that by the Atlanta pick 3 QB's will be gone. To Atlanta is really in control of the draft now and given their restructure of Ryan I could see them trading down as someone tries to move up for a QB. So assuming that happens the top 4 QB's are gone. 

Next year Phil will have 3 1st round picks and be in a much better position to move us to get a QB that we will unless we lose out. 

Trading up to get a QB seems like a bad idea because we have a bad team at right now. (our O Line is terrible) so giving up that much capital for the 4th or 5th best guy seems like a bad move. 

I think we need to trade down, get more capital and just see how the team plays this year... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Im feel pretty blue about our prospects.. That Miami trade screwed us in a few ways. 

We know that by the Atlanta pick 3 QB's will be gone. To Atlanta is really in control of the draft now and given their restructure of Ryan I could see them trading down as someone tries to move up for a QB. So assuming that happens the top 4 QB's are gone. 

Next year Phil will have 3 1st round picks and be in a much better position to move us to get a QB that we will unless we lose out. 

Trading up to get a QB seems like a bad idea because we have a bad team at right now. (our O Line is terrible) so giving up that much capital for the 4th or 5th best guy seems like a bad move. 

I think we need to trade down, get more capital and just see how the team plays this year... 

Insert complaint about winning the Washington game here.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Just to make sure I'm understanding you here, you would take Sewell over Fields and Lance?

I would 100% take Sewell over Lance for sure. I’m leaning 50% that I’d take him over Fields. Id 100% take him over Pitts. 
 

The main guys I wanted for us going into the draft process was Fields, Pitts and Sewell with Sewell and Fields likely being gone before 8. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

I would 100% take Sewell over Lance for sure. I’m leaning 50% that I’d take him over Fields. Id 100% take him over Pitts. 

The main guys I wanted for us going into the draft process was Fields, Pitts and Sewell with Sewell and Fields likely being gone before 8. 

Gotcha.

To be clear, I wasn't necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with that take. I just wanted to make sure I understood you properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...