Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How realistic a chance at Sewell?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's what everybody expected, but there's lots of talk now it could go another way.

(no way I'd bypass Sewell if I were them, but I'm not them)

I mean if Sewell is still on the board when we pick. You take him. But I agree he may not even get out of the top 4 at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

If Sewell is on the board you pick him. If he’s not you pick your Fields or Lance depending if either are there. If they are all gone and you can’t trade back grab Pitts. 

Just to make sure I'm understanding you here, you would take Sewell over Fields and Lance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Klein expands on his prior tweet...

Anyone else have Slater or Surtain over Sewell right now?

Not me, but Slater is getting a lot of whisper.  I see Pitts, Sewell, Chase, and maybe some dark horse pass rusher or CB possibly making the top 8.  If SF takes Jones, that plays well into our hands, but the phones will be ringing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im feel pretty blue about our prospects.. That Miami trade screwed us in a few ways. 

We know that by the Atlanta pick 3 QB's will be gone. To Atlanta is really in control of the draft now and given their restructure of Ryan I could see them trading down as someone tries to move up for a QB. So assuming that happens the top 4 QB's are gone. 

Next year Phil will have 3 1st round picks and be in a much better position to move us to get a QB that we will unless we lose out. 

Trading up to get a QB seems like a bad idea because we have a bad team at right now. (our O Line is terrible) so giving up that much capital for the 4th or 5th best guy seems like a bad move. 

I think we need to trade down, get more capital and just see how the team plays this year... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Im feel pretty blue about our prospects.. That Miami trade screwed us in a few ways. 

We know that by the Atlanta pick 3 QB's will be gone. To Atlanta is really in control of the draft now and given their restructure of Ryan I could see them trading down as someone tries to move up for a QB. So assuming that happens the top 4 QB's are gone. 

Next year Phil will have 3 1st round picks and be in a much better position to move us to get a QB that we will unless we lose out. 

Trading up to get a QB seems like a bad idea because we have a bad team at right now. (our O Line is terrible) so giving up that much capital for the 4th or 5th best guy seems like a bad move. 

I think we need to trade down, get more capital and just see how the team plays this year... 

Insert complaint about winning the Washington game here.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Just to make sure I'm understanding you here, you would take Sewell over Fields and Lance?

I would 100% take Sewell over Lance for sure. I’m leaning 50% that I’d take him over Fields. Id 100% take him over Pitts. 
 

The main guys I wanted for us going into the draft process was Fields, Pitts and Sewell with Sewell and Fields likely being gone before 8. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

I would 100% take Sewell over Lance for sure. I’m leaning 50% that I’d take him over Fields. Id 100% take him over Pitts. 

The main guys I wanted for us going into the draft process was Fields, Pitts and Sewell with Sewell and Fields likely being gone before 8. 

Gotcha.

To be clear, I wasn't necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with that take. I just wanted to make sure I understood you properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I find it funny those who continue to hate on Bryce based on his rookie year when he had zero weapons or offensive line have a problem with those of us projecting his career from the 8-9 games where he played like a top 10 QB and made more big time throws during that period than any other QB.  The stats may bot have been there in terms of yards or TD passes but that’s coming as the roster improves. For those who think physical traits can overcome roster deficiencies we all witnessed how Mahomes looked under pressure that Bryce faced for most of his rookie year, we saw what happened with Stroud in similar circumstances.  None of us were creating posts proclaiming Bryce as the next Brady but we can’t just sit idly while thread after thread is created continuing with the  anti Bryce tropes  instead of supporting him and just letting him continue to develop.     
    • To me Bryce's ceiling is his backup, Andy Dalton, in his prime.  Sure, he may get us some winning seasons and may even get us to the playoffs on occasion, but with an early exit.  To me he doesn't have what it takes to be elite and it takes an elite QB to consistently get deep into the playoffs.  He's not Jackson, he's not Mahomes and he's not even Allen.  In an organization like Philly, he possibly could have what it takes to make a deep run, but let's face it...Philly is well oiled machine and and we are a GMC Grimlin.
    • If he was he would still be in the league.... Cam never learned to play QB without relying on his athletism and rocket arm.   
×
×
  • Create New...