Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing in the draft?


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sounds like Rhule has roster control per the contracts. 

“I think in terms of on the contract, a lot of those things probably rest with me,” Rhule said, via Darin Gantt of Panthers.com. “But that’s not something I’m real interested in. I think it’s kind of a formality. Scott’s here to run the personnel. He’s here to build the roster. He’s here to establish the draft process. I think some things are written into the contract, but I think we’re going to work collaboratively and work together.”

 

Per Rhule's contract (no plural), which I assume is somewhat Belichickian in nature from the sounds of it. He sounds like a reasonable guy with a spirit of cooperation (until he isn't) though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Per Rhule's contract (no plural), which I assume is somewhat Belichickian in nature from the sounds of it. He sounds like a reasonable guy with a spirit of cooperation (until he isn't) though. 

I was also referring to Fitterer's contract, which could very well become an issue if we have success going forward and a team wants to hire him away from us. Per my understanding, we can't block him from interviewing for other GM roles if they're offering full roster control and we aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

I’d give him up for a conditional 7th that doesn’t count unless he throws for 3000 yards and becomes a 6th if he’s the MVP. Basically just getting the extra $10M guaranteed money in 2021 back into our pocket. I’m still in favor of cutting just to get the $8M back but if we can get the full $18M, you do that for a donut. 

Yep. I honestly look at anything we receive in return as a pure bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Verge said:

Lol wtf does that even mean. An embarrassingly bad take.

It means he never learned the technical side of the game and was always playing the game as if it was streetball, something that was plainly obvious if you watched him play

in any case it’s a better take than someone pretending to be an evaluator on twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

Lol wtf does that even mean. An embarrassingly bad take.

He's just a troll who just spouts poo off for clicks at this point. 

If one of the top 4 QBs drops to 8 do we attempt to trade back or do we have an open QB competition? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

It means he never learned the technical side of the game and was always playing the game as if it was streetball, something that was plainly obvious if you watched him play

I see a lot of technical things in Sam's game. I also see a lot of breakdown of his mechanics and reliance on physical skillset when a play breaks down, which in a NYJ uniform was pretty much every other play. You cannot make it to the NFL and play remotely well without learning the nuances of playing QB. Just silly. Then you would also have to argue that our entire coaching staff missed that as well. 

More stability and better coaching should put him at a higher level of play. Good enough to be a franchise QB? Who knows. Better than what we have now definitely. 

Sick dig at the end though. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

I see a lot of technical things in Sam's game. I also see a lot of breakdown of his mechanics and reliance on physical skillset when a play breaks down, which in a NYJ uniform was pretty much every other play. You cannot make it to the NFL and play remotely well without learning the nuances of playing QB. Just silly. Then you would also have to argue that our entire coaching staff missed that as well. 

More stability and better coaching should put him at a higher level of play. Good enough to be a franchise QB? Who knows. Better than what we have now definitely. 

Sick dig at the end though. 

he hasn’t played remotely well

people make it to the nfl all the time without learning the nuances of the position 

when has a player this deep into their career ever made such sweeping and radical changes to who they are and blossomed into a star 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Darnold is now our QB.. 

You almost have to go Sewell or Slater. With protection imo he'll do very well here. And I've never been a fan of the guy. Without protection, it'll be a 6 win season. 

OT will be addressed between Round 1 or Round 2. Cam Erving is not going to be our blindside starter. Both him and Eifen will be plugged in a guard with one eventually taking Paradis's spot at center once he's gone. 

Oddly enough with our current roster we're about 3 starters away from suprising alot of people. LT, Cb, and FS.  

With the amount of $$ we have next offseason, that Rhule third year habit should come true. 

Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...