Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sewell

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

vanilla B Rookie

vanilla B

Posted
Posted

If ones available at 8 I’m for it but ever since seeing how some of the “can’t miss” OL prospects of the 2013 draft turned out I’ve always been opposed to trading up for OL.  Too much quality talent at 8 regardless to make it worth giving up any more capital, especially after giving up next years 2nd for Darnold.  If Cincy takes Sewell then take Slater, Parsons, or next BPA at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)

I stay at 8, counting on 4-5 QBs to go before us--

  • Jax:  Trevor.
  • NYJ Wilson. 
  • SF Jones (Still feeling it--you people mocked me over this guy.  Mocked me!)
  • ATL (trade?) Lance is my guess, but they could go with Pitts or Sewell as well. 
  • Cincy should go with Sewell, BUT they could take Chase (Burrows wants him) or Pitts.  Burrows wants weaponry, it seems. However, if they do not pick Sewell, word on the street says that the Panthers will. (my street--in front of my house)
  • TRADE:  Miami is going WR or edge rusher-Chase is the pick here unless they trade back with Denver or someone for Fields.  Prediction: Denver (trade)for QB Fields.
  • Detroit needs a whole team of WRs.  They go WR.  Chase has to be the pick here. 
  • CAROLINA:  Someone good is going to be there--Pitts, Slater, and / or Sewell, maybe?  Go LT.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I stay at 8, counting on 4-5 QBs to go before us--

  • Jax:  Trevor.
  • NYJ Wilson. 
  • SF Jones (Still feeling it--you people mocked me over this guy.  Mocked me!)
  • ATL (trade?) Lance is my guess, but they could go with Pitts or Sewell as well. 
  • Cincy should go with Sewell, BUT they could take Chase (Burrows wants him) or Pitts.  Burrows wants weaponry, it seems. However, if they do not pick Sewell, word on the street says that the Panthers will. (my street--in front of my house)
  • TRADE:  Miami is going WR or edge rusher-Chase is the pick here unless they trade back with Denver or someone for Fields.  Prediction: Denver (trade)for QB Fields.
  • Detroit needs a whole team of WRs.  They go WR.  Chase has to be the pick here. 
  • CAROLINA:  Someone good is going to be there--Pitts, Slater, and / or Sewell, maybe?  Go LT.

 

If you're not looking for QB 8 is a good place to be. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Draft cheat sheet for people who only want the best for their Panthers:

The Draft starts at pick #3---Trevor and Wilson will be flying to Jax and NY, respectively, when SF goes to the podium, so lets start here:

3.  SF:  We want them to pick Jones.  If they do not, Jones likely goes after #8. 

4.  ATLANTA:  Now that we have a QB and prolly will not take one, we want them to take a QB--Lance, maybe? I think they like him.

5.  CINCINNATI:  Please take Chase.  Listen to your QB.  He misses him.

6.  MIAMI: They need WR or Edge Rusher, so they could reach for hometown boy Rousseau or take one of Tua's Bama mates Waddle or Smith.  All of these are OK and we will allow it.

7.  DETROIT:  They could use a WR too.  Let's hope for a run on WRs or maybe MLB Parsons.

8. CAROLINA:  Today's buffet features Sewell, Slater, Pitts, and any CB you want.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Sewell or Slater in the 1st best secondary piece in the 2nd. Safety or CB. Then a road grading guard in the 3rd for me. 

Lotta possibilities for that guard.  Heck, a few RT candidates could fill that need--like Dant'e Smith, ECU.

I hope we draft Mills, QB, Stanford in round 3 if he is there.

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you're not looking for QB 8 is a good place to be. 

If you will take Sewell or Slater (no preference) you could trade back a spot or two.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...